Page 2 of 2

Re: So why no serious "Dust Ups"

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 9:20 am
by Jami
kent wrote:
LibraryLady wrote:I can think of another pot stirrer who is not over here.

But, if you let the person try to start something, and just don't take the bait--the argument is over pretty quickly.

I guess we could find that ?? (preacher?) that 'toes researched and shut down. He was pretty outrageous.
...and then, there was the crazy woman who thought everyone was lusting over her.....and the folks who posted while under the influence. :lol:
...at least I HOPE we can blame the alcohol.


are you talking about Caroi and Hopper? :lol:



:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: So why no serious "Dust Ups"

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 9:33 am
by GRANDPA
We could invite Londonerinmunich to join. But I hope we're not that desperate.

Re: So why no serious "Dust Ups"

Posted: Mon Dec 15, 2014 9:20 am
by crocmommy
GRANDPA wrote:We could invite Londonerinmunich to join. But I hope we're not that desperate.


Is that group even still out there?

Re: So why no serious "Dust Ups"

Posted: Mon Dec 15, 2014 10:44 am
by Kiamichi
crocmommy wrote:
GRANDPA wrote:We could invite Londonerinmunich to join. But I hope we're not that desperate.


Is that group even still out there?

No, the newspaper closed it down, but some of them reassembled at this site and in this thread are discussing missing members:

http://metrogees.myfastforum.org/Christ ... l&start=20

Re: So why no serious "Dust Ups"

Posted: Mon Dec 15, 2014 11:33 am
by crocmommy
Kiamichi wrote:
crocmommy wrote:
GRANDPA wrote:We could invite Londonerinmunich to join. But I hope we're not that desperate.


Is that group even still out there?

No, the newspaper closed it down, but some of them reassembled at this site and in this thread are discussing missing members:

http://metrogees.myfastforum.org/Christ ... l&start=20


They are too funny

Re: So why no serious "Dust Ups"

Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2015 6:17 pm
by jellowrestling
crocmommy wrote:
PlanoSooner wrote:
crocmommy wrote:We know you miss that person too....

he is why MANY left dd.... with a board of 50 people... i think 3 liked him


So who were the three people...not counting Bubba??? I think Kevin only tolerated him. Maybe one of them was Jude because she likes everyone including Marsha.

I like Bubba. He's a good guy. I know that he rubbed a number of people the wrong way, and half the time, I couldn't figure out what the issue was. He's always been extremely nice to me, online and IRL. I like most of the people who had/have issues with him, too. But I did notice the bickering (just like everyone else), and he was often in the thick of it. That has been noticeably lacking here, except for CD.

Re: So why no serious "Dust Ups"

Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2015 7:37 pm
by GFB
jellowrestling wrote:
crocmommy wrote:
PlanoSooner wrote:he is why MANY left dd.... with a board of 50 people... i think 3 liked him


So who were the three people...not counting Bubba??? I think Kevin only tolerated him. Maybe one of them was Jude because she likes everyone including Marsha.



Couldn't tell you how many..but definitely an exclusive club.

Re: So why no serious "Dust Ups"

Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2015 7:50 pm
by ann jusko
It was pretty funny when he said something about "Top Secret Clearance". He truly thought that was absolutely the highest clearance. I did say "WHAT?!!!!" but I never said what the higher clearances names are, just said "No, it's not!" Then he kind of fumbled around like he knew. Really low esteem there.....

Re: So why no serious "Dust Ups"

Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2015 7:57 pm
by Sangersteve
There were 4 moderators over there, one got cut from the team over an editing issue, guess who.