Email this morning from Dan Ferris, Senior Analyst at Stansberry:
Dear Reader,
The mainstream news would have you believe that the banking crisis ended long ago with the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank, First Republic Bank, and Silvergate Bank...
But as a senior analyst at the world's largest independent financial research firm...
I believe we'll instead see a "cash frenzy" at banks as soon as March 11, 2024...
Potentially tipping the country into a full-scale financial crisis.
(That's why I'm urging you NOT to buy a single stock until you see my newest presentation.)
Everyone wants to believe things will be different this time.
They said the same thing when I called the Lehman Brothers collapse in 2008... the Bitcoin crash in 2018... and the inflation crisis of 2022...
But mark my words:
This is the #1 most important thing to pay attention to for 2024.
And I'm not talking about another market crash or inflation.
Although I expect both of those things to happen as a result of what's coming on March 11th.
No, this is much, much worse... Because it would mean the end our currency and our money, as we know it.
There will be winners and losers, of course.
And I believe I know what they are.
That's why I'm stepping forward with an urgent warning for the millions of Americans who aren't prepared for what's coming.
If you have any cash on the sidelines or any money in stocks right now, this could be the most important message you see all year.
You can hear it for yourself right here.
Good investing,
Dan Ferris
Senior Analyst, Stansberry Research
This just in from Stansberry
- planosteve
- Posts: 22975
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 8:04 pm
This just in from Stansberry
There is no bad peace and there are no good wars
Re: This just in from Stansberry
" The judge found Stansberry guilty of intentionally defrauding his clients by falsely claiming to have the ‘inside track’ on "
government deals and charging his clients $1,000 each for access to this ‘inside’ information. In addition, Stansberry used
the rising price of the stock he was promoting as proof of his knowledge and reliability to convince further clients to
purchase the stock. Since the stock price was only rising due to the purchases of his earlier clients, who were purchasing
based on the fraudulent information given to them, Stansberry was additionally found guilty of price manipulation.
Stansberry appealed the court’s decision in 2001 but the guilty verdict was upheld. A further effort to appeal the ruling was denied
Just a snippet of research
government deals and charging his clients $1,000 each for access to this ‘inside’ information. In addition, Stansberry used
the rising price of the stock he was promoting as proof of his knowledge and reliability to convince further clients to
purchase the stock. Since the stock price was only rising due to the purchases of his earlier clients, who were purchasing
based on the fraudulent information given to them, Stansberry was additionally found guilty of price manipulation.
Stansberry appealed the court’s decision in 2001 but the guilty verdict was upheld. A further effort to appeal the ruling was denied
Just a snippet of research
- planosteve
- Posts: 22975
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 8:04 pm
Re: This just in from Stansberry
[quote="Twiggler"]" The judge found Stansberry guilty of intentionally defrauding his clients by falsely claiming to have the ‘inside track’ on "
government deals and charging his clients $1,000 each for access to this ‘inside’ information. In addition, Stansberry used
the rising price of the stock he was promoting as proof of his knowledge and reliability to convince further clients to
purchase the stock. Since the stock price was only rising due to the purchases of his earlier clients, who were purchasing
based on the fraudulent information given to them, Stansberry was additionally found guilty of price manipulation.
Stansberry appealed the court’s decision in 2001 but the guilty verdict was upheld. A further effort to appeal the ruling was denied
Thanks Twig. Saved me the trouble. I'm not endorsing him. The only investments I trust are silver and gold. Which are doing very well right now, especially the mining stocks.
government deals and charging his clients $1,000 each for access to this ‘inside’ information. In addition, Stansberry used
the rising price of the stock he was promoting as proof of his knowledge and reliability to convince further clients to
purchase the stock. Since the stock price was only rising due to the purchases of his earlier clients, who were purchasing
based on the fraudulent information given to them, Stansberry was additionally found guilty of price manipulation.
Stansberry appealed the court’s decision in 2001 but the guilty verdict was upheld. A further effort to appeal the ruling was denied
Thanks Twig. Saved me the trouble. I'm not endorsing him. The only investments I trust are silver and gold. Which are doing very well right now, especially the mining stocks.
There is no bad peace and there are no good wars
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 31 guests