Huge, if true. Some suspected this

[Sangersteve]

I will be releasing an affidavit from an ABC whistleblower regarding the debate. I have just signed a non-disclosure agreement with the attorney of the whistleblower. The affidavit states how the Harris campaign was given sample question which were essentially the same questions that were given during the debate and separate assurances of fact checking Donald Trump and that she would NOT be fact checked. Accordingly, the affidavit states several other factors that were built into the debate to give Kamala a significant advantage. I have seen and read the affidavit and after the attorney blacks out the name of the whistleblower and other information that could dox the whistleblower, I will release the full affidavit. I will be releasing the affidavit before the weekend is out.

[Kiamichi]

It isn't, you can count on it.

[planosteve]

the Harris campaign was given sample question which were essentially the same questions

Bullshit.
Given "sample question" or questions? That's got to be intentional.

[Sangersteve]

It isn't, you can count on it.

The name Donna Brazille seems to ring a bell

[Mark]

This is something that everybody just knew intuitively.

[Kiamichi]

It isn't, you can count on it.

The name Donna Brazille seems to ring a bell

The fact that the networks are a tool of the Democratic Party is self-evident, but they will have better sense than leave a paper trail of their collusion when hosting a debate.

[BigTex]

Even if true, nothing will come of it.

[Mark]

It isn't, you can count on it.

The name Donna Brazille seems to ring a bell

The fact that the networks are a tool of the Democratic Party is self-evident, but they will have better sense than leave a paper trail of their collusion when hosting a debate.

I believe they're all arrogant enough to not give a shit that the whole world knows.

[GRANDPA]

Don't just say it, DO IT.