If Oswald didn't kill Kennedy who did?

[planosteve]

Maybe the biggest coverup in history detailed in one of the most suppressed books ever published. Proof that the Israeli MOSSAD killed JFK in Dallas.

https://www.unz.com/book/michael_collin ... -judgment/

[GFB]

Dipshit thread

[planosteve]

Dipshit thread

Mark Lane’s Plausible Denial proved conclusively that the CIA had a hand in the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.

[GRANDPA]

Dipshit thread

Mark Lane’s Plausible Denial proved conclusively that the CIA had a hand in the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.

That does not preclude Oswald from being the shooter, nor even the only shooter.

[planosteve]

Dipshit thread

Mark Lane’s Plausible Denial proved conclusively that the CIA had a hand in the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.

That does not preclude Oswald from being the shooter, nor even the only shooter.

I don't think absolute slam dunk evidence is ever going to come this late in the game. But, we do know a lot more now. I don't remember any discussion at all about how pro Israel LBJ was back in the day.

[GRANDPA]

I don't remember any discussion at all about how pro Israel LBJ was back in the day.

Probably because there wasn't any. It was a given that Israel was just another ally, & there were other more important & pressing things to talk about. Like LBJ's buddy Billy Sol Estes & LBJ's possible dumping from the 1964 ticket.

[planosteve]

I don't remember any discussion at all about how pro Israel LBJ was back in the day.

Probably because there wasn't any. It was a given that Israel was just another ally, & there were other more important & pressing things to talk about. Like LBJ's buddy Billy Sol Estes & LBJ's possible dumping from the 1964 ticket.

Or more likely because virtually any criticism of Israel would get you branded an antisemite.

[GRANDPA]

I seriously doubt that slowed anyone down back then.

[GFB]

I seriously doubt that slowed anyone down back then.

Nor does it now..obviously.

I would even say it’s rather stylish..(amongst retards)

[Mark]

Who killed JFK?

It was probably the Jews and the Masons.

[BigTex]

Why did Oswald leave the TSBD without his curtain rods? And why were they never found when the building was searched?

[Kiamichi]

Why did Oswald leave the TSBD without his curtain rods? And why were they never found when the building was searched?

He actually denied everything about those curtain rods and said he carried nothing to work that day but his lunch. Everyone who said he mentioned curtain rods or saw him carrying a long package (and there were a lot of such people)? Either mistaken or lying.

[GRANDPA]

Why did Oswald leave the TSBD without his curtain rods? And why were they never found when the building was searched?

Because the curtain rods magically turned into Mannlicher-Carcano rifle that was found on the Sixth floor by a Dallas county sheriff deputy. Oswald had access to & was known to be on the Sixth floor.

[planosteve]

Why did Oswald leave the TSBD without his curtain rods? And why were they never found when the building was searched?

Because the curtain rods magically turned into Mannlicher-Carcano rifle that was found on the Sixth floor by a Dallas county sheriff deputy. Oswald had access to & was known to be on the Sixth floor.

On 22nd November, 1963, Weitzman and Roger Craig discovered the rifle on the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository. He initially described it as a 7.65 Mauser. Later he changed his mind and said it was a Mannlicher-Carcano.

[Kiamichi]

Why did Oswald leave the TSBD without his curtain rods? And why were they never found when the building was searched?

Because the curtain rods magically turned into Mannlicher-Carcano rifle that was found on the Sixth floor by a Dallas county sheriff deputy. Oswald had access to & was known to be on the Sixth floor.

On 22nd November, 1963, Weitzman and Roger Craig discovered the rifle on the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository. He initially described it as a 7.65 Mauser. Later he changed his mind and said it was a Mannlicher-Carcano.

True, and he never claimed to be an expert on weapons. He never disputed that the rifle he saw was the one that was photographed at the time in its hiding place, and that the plain clothes officer displayed to photographers on site at the time.