In a letter sent to the U.S. State Department and just filed today with U.S. federal Judge Emmet G. Sullivan, the counsel for Cheryl Mills wrote: “Ms. Mills does not believe that she has paper copies of potential records in her possession. Following our production on August 10, 2015 [of the defense counsel’s version of the electronic records], we have instructed her to delete any and all electronic records in her possession.” That is a far stretch from a statement by Ms. Mills under penalty of perjury, and she and her lawyers are planning to delete the emails Judge Sullivan wants produced? Judicial Watch has made an emergency filing in Judge Sullivan’s court to stop the further destruction of evidence of what may very well be assorted criminal conduct and violations of numerous federal laws. This all just surfaced in State Department’s status report filed today in response to Judge Sullivan’s order. Yesterday evening, State finally produced some correspondence between it and Hillary’s right and left hands—Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills. It has not produced its correspondence with Mrs. Clinton, and it is now clear that Mrs. Clinton, Ms. Abedin and Ms. Mills plan to thumb their noses at the Judge and the State Department. No one is “cooperating,” despite their empty rhetoric to the contrary. The correspondence that has been produced verifies that the State Department itself has not been forthcoming with Judge Sullivan, with Congress, or with anyone else. It allowed Mrs. Clinton to use an off-the-grid system for her entire tenure in the Department, and it kept that startling fact a secret as long as possible. It is simply shocking that the State Department did not immediately inform Congress, the Court, and Judicial Watch that Mrs. Clinton operated solely on a private email server and that the State Department did not have her records. It took months even to discover those crucial facts. And as Judge Emmet G. Sullivan bores toward the truth, more revelations continue to surface. Read more at http://observer.com/2015/08/breaking-ch ... z3iEJiqCm7 Follow us: @observer on Twitter | Observer on Facebook Read more at: http://tr.im/OfUsG
Ignore it, it's only a court order
- Sangersteve
- Posts: 8662
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 3:27 pm
Ignore it, it's only a court order
It's a joke son,I say a joke
- millergrovesue
- Posts: 3193
- Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2014 7:11 am
- Location: Cumby, Texas
- Contact:
Re: Ignore it, it's only a court order
And I'm sure they will get away with it. Buncha crooks.
Working to love my fellow person regardless : >
- John in Plano
- Posts: 3774
- Joined: Mon May 26, 2014 9:02 am
Re: Ignore it, it's only a court order
Its August 8th, a couple days before they produce them on August 10th 

It's ok if you disagree with me.
I can't force you to be right.
I can't force you to be right.
-
- Posts: 880
- Joined: Mon May 26, 2014 2:37 pm
Re: Ignore it, it's only a court order
Will a HONEST JUDGE please step forward ! anyone, anyone, someone Hello, hello....... guess that answers that when it comes to the Clintons
- millergrovesue
- Posts: 3193
- Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2014 7:11 am
- Location: Cumby, Texas
- Contact:
Re: Ignore it, it's only a court order
glenn/dallas wrote:Will a HONEST JUDGE please step forward ! anyone, anyone, someone Hello, hello....... guess that answers that when it comes to the Clintons
Yeah, wouldn't you think someone would finally do something???????????
Working to love my fellow person regardless : >
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 32 guests