Stella Awards- Too crazy to be true, but it is !

[glenn/dallas]

Stella Awards


It's time again for the annual " Stella Awards"!


For those unfamiliar with these awards, they are named after 81-year-old Stella Liebeck who spilled hot coffee on herself and successfully sued the McDonald's in New Mexico, where she purchased coffee.





You remember, she took the lid off the coffee and put it between her knees while she was driving. Who would ever think one could get burned doing that, right?





That's right; these are awards for the most outlandish lawsuits and verdicts in the U.S. You know, the kinds of cases that make you scratch your head. So keep your head scratcher handy.



Here are the Stellas for this year:


* SEVENTH PLACE *

Kathleen Robertson of Austin, Texas was awarded $80,000 by a jury of her peers after breaking her ankle tripping over a toddler who was running inside a furniture store. The store owners were understandably surprised by the verdict, considering the running toddler was her own son.

Start scratching!


* SIXTH PLACE *

Carl Truman, 19, of Los Angeles, California won $74,000 plus medical expenses when his neighbor ran over his hand with a Honda Accord. Truman apparently didn't notice there was someone at the wheel of the car when he was trying to steal his neighbor's hubcaps.

Scratch some more...

* FIFTH PLACE *

Terrence Dickson, of Bristol, Pennsylvania, who was leaving a house he had just burglarized by way of the garage. Unfortunately for Dickson, the automatic garage door opener malfunctioned and he could not get the garage door to open. Worse, he couldn't re-enter the house because the door connecting the garage to the house locked when Dickson pulled it shut.


Forced to sit for eight, count 'em, EIGHT days and survive on a case of Pepsi and a large bag of dry dog food, he sued the homeowner's insurance company claiming undue mental Anguish.


Amazingly, the jury said the insurance company must pay Dickson $500,000 for his anguish. We should all have this kind of anguish Keep scratching.


There are more...

Double hand scratching after this one..


* FOURTH PLACE *

Jerry Williams, of Little Rock, Arkansas, garnered 4th Place in the Stella's when he was awarded $14,500 plus medical expenses after being bitten on the butt by his next door neighbor's beagle - even though the beagle was on a chain in its owner's fenced yard.


Williams did not get as much as he asked for because the jury believed the beagle might have been provoked at the time of the butt bite because Williams had climbed over the fence into the yard and repeatedly shot the dog with a pellet gun.

Pick a new spot to scratch, you're getting a bald spot..

* THIRD PLACE *

Amber Carson of Lancaster, Pennsylvania because a jury ordered a Philadelphia restaurant to pay her $113,500 after she slipped on a spilled soft drink and broke her tailbone.


The reason the soft drink was on the floor: Ms. Carson had thrown it at her boyfriend 30 seconds earlier during an argument.


Only two more so ease up on the scratching...

*SECOND PLACE*

Kara Walton, of Claymont, Delaware sued the owner of a night club in a nearby city because she fell from the bathroom window to the floor, knocking out her two front teeth. Even though Ms. Walton was trying to sneak through the ladies room window to avoid paying the $3.50 cover charge, the jury said the night club had to pay her $12,000....oh, yeah, plus dental expenses. Go figure.

Ok. Here we go!!

* FIRST PLACE *

This year's runaway First Place Stella Award winner was: Mrs. Merv Grazinski, of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, who purchased a new 32-foot Winnebago motor home.


On her first trip home, from an OU football game, having driven on to the freeway, she set the cruise control at 70 mph and calmly left the driver's seat to go to the back of the Winnebago to make herself a sandwich. Not surprisingly, the motor home left the freeway, crashed and overturned. Also
not surprisingly, Mrs. Grazinski sued Winnebago for not putting in the owner's manual that she couldn't actually leave the driver's seat while the cruise control was set. The Oklahoma jury awarded her, are you sitting down? . . . . . . . $1,750,000.

PLUS a new motor home. Winnebago actually changed their manuals as a result of this suit, just in case Mrs. Grazinski has any relatives who might also buy a motor home.

If you think the USA court system is out of control, be sure to pass this one on.


As Perry White would say: GREAT CEASARS GHOST*

*Perry White was Clark Kents Editor


　


　


　















=













--------------------------------------------------------------------------------






This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com

[Kiamichi]

All bogus.

http://www.snopes.com/legal/lawsuits.asp

[millergrovesue]

Thanks for the Snopes report, K. I have great faith in the jury system having dealt with it both as a juror and as a plaintiff.

[BigTex]

There are certainly verifiable cases of large jury awards to people who were essentially victims of their own misunderstanding (at best) or stupidity (at worst). The key is how the judge explains the law to the jury and what instructions they are given on how they can rule.

[mayhem]

The McDonalds Coffee isn't what it purported to be either.

[crocmommy]

I have to admit I laughed the most at the story about the burglar who got stuck in the garage for 8 days subsisting on dog food and Pepsi. Even if it's not true, it was still funny to read.

[Mark]

There are certainly verifiable cases of large jury awards to people who were essentially victims of their own misunderstanding (at best) or stupidity (at worst). The key is how the judge explains the law to the jury and what instructions they are given on how they can rule.

Most people don't understand that jurors can ignore the judge's directions, and can even ignore the law itself if they judge the law to be unjust. Jury nullification is a check and balance that has been largely eliminated in this country.

[BillB]

There are certainly verifiable cases of large jury awards to people who were essentially victims of their own misunderstanding (at best) or stupidity (at worst). The key is how the judge explains the law to the jury and what instructions they are given on how they can rule.

Most people don't understand that jurors can ignore the judge's directions, and can even ignore the law itself if they judge the law to be unjust. Jury nullification is a check and balance that has been largely eliminated in this country.

Jury nullification, especially in criminal cases, is one of the chief safeguards of our liberty.
More people need to be made aware of it.

[BigTex]

There are certainly verifiable cases of large jury awards to people who were essentially victims of their own misunderstanding (at best) or stupidity (at worst). The key is how the judge explains the law to the jury and what instructions they are given on how they can rule.

Most people don't understand that jurors can ignore the judge's directions, and can even ignore the law itself if they judge the law to be unjust. Jury nullification is a check and balance that has been largely eliminated in this country.

That's a good point. But depending on the makeup of the jury, they may just want to reach a verdict and get out of there. Here's a question: is counsel allowed to tell this to the jury or can only the judge do that?

[BillB]

There are certainly verifiable cases of large jury awards to people who were essentially victims of their own misunderstanding (at best) or stupidity (at worst). The key is how the judge explains the law to the jury and what instructions they are given on how they can rule.

Most people don't understand that jurors can ignore the judge's directions, and can even ignore the law itself if they judge the law to be unjust. Jury nullification is a check and balance that has been largely eliminated in this country.

That's a good point. But depending on the makeup of the jury, they may just want to reach a verdict and get out of there. Here's a question: is counsel allowed to tell this to the jury or can only the judge do that?

No, council is not allowed to mention Jury Nullification. A judge won't mention it.