In areas with the most restrictive gun laws, gun violence has increased. In areas where people are allowed to practice more free, though still regulated gun ownership, gun violence has declined – dramatically.
Why then are Democrats using an act of Islamic terror in San Bernardino, California to demand yet more gun laws?
Do they really desire more gun violence? It would certainly appear so.
“For example,Congressional Research Service showed that the number of privately owned firearms increased from 192 million in 1994 to 310 million in 2009…So gun ownership increased for 20 years, but “gun homicides” decreased–except in gun free zones.”
As the Mainstream Media reluctantly finds itself forced to admit the terrible tragedy in San Bernardino was without a doubt, an act of Islamic terrorism, it brushes past that fact and focuses almost entirely on some of the weapons used by the terrorists. (ignoring the pipe bombs altogether)
Democrats are now rushing out and repeating the mantra of “more gun laws, more gun laws, more gun laws” while purposely NOT asking questions related to why these Muslim terrorists were not being closely monitored, or if they were, why the Feds failed to stop them before they set out to kill innocents in the name of Allah.
And even as the factual statistics show that the only areas where gun violence is increasing are in “gun free zones”, these same Democrats and Mainstream Media now demand to make all of America a gun-free zone.
