A query

Description of your first forum.
User avatar
GFB
Posts: 30584
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 6:59 pm
Location: Native American

Re: A query

Postby GFB » Wed Dec 20, 2017 11:41 am

kent wrote:
GFB wrote:
kent wrote:
I beg to differ, it IS my money. For the past 40 years, I have had nearly 8% taken out of my check along with the employer paying 8%. that's my money. Yes, it was used to fund older folks, fine. The problem is, Congress "borrowed" the SS money to fund their pet, feel good projects.

Democrats don't like the revamping of the tax code because it doesn't punish corporations or "the rich"; it doesn't set earning limits.

As for outsourcing jobs, it's pretty interesting that the same people complaining about that are FOR open borders and illegals getting full government benefits!


This is why it is an entitlement.

You and LL believe it is your money, and are entitled to it.

It could be cut at any time to whatever Congress thinks it should be.


and they would be stealing the money they took from my paycheck. Simple.


They already did that..and are still doing it if you’re still working.
If you’re “woke”..you’re a loser.

User avatar
rusty
Posts: 5480
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2016 9:10 pm

Re: A query

Postby rusty » Wed Dec 20, 2017 12:20 pm

GFB wrote:
kent wrote:
GFB wrote:

You're wrong there..about SS not being an entitlement because it's "your money."

There is no pot of money with "Library Lady" printed on it. Your checks continue to flow in because there are younger people working and paying for you to receive them.

They could be cut at any time. That doesn't happen simply because Congress fears the wrath of older people and groups like AARP.

I think we can expect SS to be cut this coming year for people who are not yet collecting it.


I beg to differ, it IS my money. For the past 40 years, I have had nearly 8% taken out of my check along with the employer paying 8%. that's my money. Yes, it was used to fund older folks, fine. The problem is, Congress "borrowed" the SS money to fund their pet, feel good projects.

Democrats don't like the revamping of the tax code because it doesn't punish corporations or "the rich"; it doesn't set earning limits.

As for outsourcing jobs, it's pretty interesting that the same people complaining about that are FOR open borders and illegals getting full government benefits!


This is why it is an entitlement.

You and LL believe it is your money, and are entitled to it.

It could be cut at any time to whatever Congress thinks it should be.


You can call a pig a turtle but it's still a pig.

Social Security and Medicare are earned benefits.

Is your life insurance policy an entitlement? Chances are you'll never pay in premium what you will receive in benefit.

Is your personal retirement portfolio an entitlement? Hopefully, you will be able to take out a lot more than you contributed.

User avatar
Mark
Posts: 8267
Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 9:28 pm

Re: A query

Postby Mark » Wed Dec 20, 2017 5:59 pm

Social Security has been a pay as you go program since day 1. Money is taken from current workers to make payments to current recipients. There has never been any social security accounts with individual names on them.

I'll add that Social Security is blatantly unconstitutional.
The United States Constitution is under attack by the Democrat/Communist party.

By popular request:

Indeed, "All Leftists lack critical thinking skills."

Indeed, "All Leftist males are pussies."

Red Oak
Posts: 6229
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 7:00 pm

Re: A query

Postby Red Oak » Thu Dec 21, 2017 11:23 am

You do not "own" your SS Benefts, it would be great if you did, but that is not how FDR's Intergenerational Ponzi scheme works.
Image

I am a never Hillaryite!

grouchy
Posts: 5415
Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 9:30 am
Location: Files Valley

Re: A query

Postby grouchy » Thu Dec 21, 2017 11:38 am

Red Oak wrote:You do not "own" your SS Benefts, it would be great if you did, but that is not how FDR's Intergenerational Ponzi scheme works.

Just curious, do you think that you will be able to draw SS?
Actually, the question is intended for all.

User avatar
planosteve
Posts: 22423
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 8:04 pm

Re: A query

Postby planosteve » Thu Dec 21, 2017 12:03 pm

I've probably been on SS longer than anyone here. It's a scam. Your biggest check will be the first one and the purchasing power will go down every month from then on. I see a lot of things that cost 4 times what they did when I first started drawing SS. And what's worse is that a lot of pensions are tied to SS. So, you only get a tiny increase every year regardless of what pension plan you have. You could take your money out of an IRA or 401k. But, you will not likely get much more than 1% in any kind of savings account.
I don't think the end is near anymore. :D I think it's HERE! :o

User avatar
Mark
Posts: 8267
Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 9:28 pm

Re: A query

Postby Mark » Thu Dec 21, 2017 12:15 pm

grouchy wrote:
Red Oak wrote:You do not "own" your SS Benefts, it would be great if you did, but that is not how FDR's Intergenerational Ponzi scheme works.

Just curious, do you think that you will be able to draw SS?
Actually, the question is intended for all.



That all depends entirely on how much of a stomach future legislators have for debt. It absolutely can not be sustained without either incurring massive debt or implementing confiscatory tax policies on future generations.

Here is another question for all: If Social Security existed in the free market alongside other retirement investment products, how many would choose Social Security?

If Social Security is such a great deal, then why does the government have to make it mandatory?
The United States Constitution is under attack by the Democrat/Communist party.

By popular request:

Indeed, "All Leftists lack critical thinking skills."

Indeed, "All Leftist males are pussies."

User avatar
LibraryLady2
Posts: 1659
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2016 2:41 pm

Re: A query

Postby LibraryLady2 » Thu Dec 21, 2017 1:08 pm

If Social Security is such a great deal, then why does the government have to make it mandatory?


SS was never intended to be a retirement plan. It was a plan to keep people from actually starving--such as what happened in the depression.
It was intended to be a way for someone to have food/shelter and not be on the streets.

It is mandatory so that there is enough money to fund the system.
“A reader lives a thousand lives before he dies. The man who never reads lives only one.” -- Jojen Reed

User avatar
Mark
Posts: 8267
Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 9:28 pm

Re: A query

Postby Mark » Thu Dec 21, 2017 2:50 pm

LibraryLady2 wrote:
If Social Security is such a great deal, then why does the government have to make it mandatory?


SS was never intended to be a retirement plan. It was a plan to keep people from actually starving--such as what happened in the depression.
It was intended to be a way for someone to have food/shelter and not be on the streets.

It is mandatory so that there is enough money to fund the system.



Then why are the payments made whether the recipients need them or not?
The United States Constitution is under attack by the Democrat/Communist party.

By popular request:

Indeed, "All Leftists lack critical thinking skills."

Indeed, "All Leftist males are pussies."

User avatar
GFB
Posts: 30584
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 6:59 pm
Location: Native American

Re: A query

Postby GFB » Thu Dec 21, 2017 2:56 pm

Mark wrote:
LibraryLady2 wrote:
If Social Security is such a great deal, then why does the government have to make it mandatory?


SS was never intended to be a retirement plan. It was a plan to keep people from actually starving--such as what happened in the depression.
It was intended to be a way for someone to have food/shelter and not be on the streets.

It is mandatory so that there is enough money to fund the system.



Then why are the payments made whether the recipients need them or not?



Bada bingo!
If you’re “woke”..you’re a loser.

Red Oak
Posts: 6229
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 7:00 pm

Re: A query

Postby Red Oak » Thu Dec 21, 2017 3:03 pm

Grouchy - to answer your question I will probably receive some SS payments, I may live long enough to see the collapse of SS, and probably long enough to see the means testing and reduction in SS benefits that are certain to occur.

Most people that earned around the average income, and have retired in the last 5 or 10 years will receive less from SS adjusted for inflation that what they paid in, and this gap increases for every year that passes.

Don't confuse Federal Taxes with SS, they are not directly connected.
Image

I am a never Hillaryite!

User avatar
rusty
Posts: 5480
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2016 9:10 pm

Re: A query

Postby rusty » Thu Dec 21, 2017 4:31 pm

Mark wrote:
LibraryLady2 wrote:
If Social Security is such a great deal, then why does the government have to make it mandatory?


SS was never intended to be a retirement plan. It was a plan to keep people from actually starving--such as what happened in the depression.
It was intended to be a way for someone to have food/shelter and not be on the streets.

It is mandatory so that there is enough money to fund the system.



Then why are the payments made whether the recipients need them or not?


Simple. Because everyone contributes. Same as Medicare.

Red Oak
Posts: 6229
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 7:00 pm

Re: A query

Postby Red Oak » Thu Dec 21, 2017 8:23 pm

Money taken from you under color of law is not a "contribution" :lol:
Image

I am a never Hillaryite!

User avatar
GFB
Posts: 30584
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 6:59 pm
Location: Native American

Re: A query

Postby GFB » Thu Dec 21, 2017 9:41 pm

Red Oak wrote:Money taken from you under color of law is not a "contribution" :lol:


That’s for DAMN sure!
If you’re “woke”..you’re a loser.

User avatar
rusty
Posts: 5480
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2016 9:10 pm

Re: A query

Postby rusty » Thu Dec 21, 2017 10:16 pm

Y'all are confusing the word "contribution" with the word "donation".

Contributions can be voluntary or involuntary.

mayhem
Posts: 2805
Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 3:36 pm

Re: A query

Postby mayhem » Thu Dec 21, 2017 11:46 pm

"I want a chart to show how the government programs to pay the military will be funded when all the cuts for business kick in.
The gov't will be taking in less money so how does Congress expect to pay for the improvements to infrastructure (roads/bridges) that Trump has promised?"

Library Lady, my mantra is "We'll see."

"They" can't back up much of anything and ddt keeps saying "Believe me."

But, we will see. On lotsa whangie dangie dang dang.

Wonder if ddt has shuttered the UN Bldg yet.

We'll see.

Wonder when that dissembling nincompoop will honor his promise to release his 1040 whatever.

We'll see.
All Life is Feudal

jellowrestling
Posts: 8173
Joined: Mon May 26, 2014 1:16 am

Re: A query

Postby jellowrestling » Fri Dec 22, 2017 1:50 am

kent wrote:
GFB wrote:
kent wrote:
I beg to differ, it IS my money. For the past 40 years, I have had nearly 8% taken out of my check along with the employer paying 8%. that's my money. Yes, it was used to fund older folks, fine. The problem is, Congress "borrowed" the SS money to fund their pet, feel good projects.

Democrats don't like the revamping of the tax code because it doesn't punish corporations or "the rich"; it doesn't set earning limits.

As for outsourcing jobs, it's pretty interesting that the same people complaining about that are FOR open borders and illegals getting full government benefits!


This is why it is an entitlement.

You and LL believe it is your money, and are entitled to it.

It could be cut at any time to whatever Congress thinks it should be.


and they would be stealing the money they took from my paycheck. Simple.

That already happened. Now the money has to be stolen from somebody else.

jellowrestling
Posts: 8173
Joined: Mon May 26, 2014 1:16 am

Re: A query

Postby jellowrestling » Fri Dec 22, 2017 1:59 am

I did talk to someone today who is adversely affected by the tax bill. My parents three bedroom, 1800 sq ft frame home in University Park (built in 1938) is well over the limit for the property tax deduction. It comes at a particularly bad time, because they bought another house last year, with the intent to move into it and tear down the old one, then build a posh abode.


Return to “Your first forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Mark and 201 guests