The intellectual dishonesty of Democrats

Description of your first forum.
User avatar
rusty
Posts: 5771
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2016 9:10 pm

Re: The intellectual dishonesty of Democrats

Postby rusty » Tue Oct 22, 2024 7:46 am

jellowrestling wrote:
rusty wrote:
jellowrestling wrote:By "reproductive rights", I assume you mean the unbridled slaughter of babies, because that's the Democrat position. But Democrats are also lying about the GOP's stance on IVF.



So you think IVF is a good trade off for people like Kate who had to leave the state to have an abortion when her child would surely not survive outside the womb?

I’ve got two daughters and a daughter-in-law. Fortunately we’ve never been in a position to even consider abortion. But if one of my daughters had been in a situation where their child wouldn’t have survived, I would not want her to bear the burden of having to carry that child to term. Would you?

Well, of course, I never said anything like that. Yes, I believe that there can be some discussion about unviable fetuses. But I also know a woman whose otherwise healthy baby died when the umbilical cord wrapped around his neck. She bore the stillborn child and buried him. That was incredibly sad, but it would have been exponentially worse to have torn the little boy to pieces.


Yes, we both know there's anectdotal evidence for both sides. But when Ken Paxton thinks he's smarter than the doctors, we have a huge problem.

jellowrestling
Posts: 8340
Joined: Mon May 26, 2014 1:16 am

Re: The intellectual dishonesty of Democrats

Postby jellowrestling » Thu Oct 24, 2024 10:12 am

rusty wrote:
jellowrestling wrote:
rusty wrote:

So you think IVF is a good trade off for people like Kate who had to leave the state to have an abortion when her child would surely not survive outside the womb?

I’ve got two daughters and a daughter-in-law. Fortunately we’ve never been in a position to even consider abortion. But if one of my daughters had been in a situation where their child wouldn’t have survived, I would not want her to bear the burden of having to carry that child to term. Would you?

Well, of course, I never said anything like that. Yes, I believe that there can be some discussion about unviable fetuses. But I also know a woman whose otherwise healthy baby died when the umbilical cord wrapped around his neck. She bore the stillborn child and buried him. That was incredibly sad, but it would have been exponentially worse to have torn the little boy to pieces.


Yes, we both know there's anectdotal evidence for both sides. But when Ken Paxton thinks he's smarter than the doctors, we have a huge problem.

Unfortunately, there are a number of doctors who routinely violate the Hippocratic Oath. I don't think that any reasonable person believes that the life of the mother should be saved when medically necessary, but killing a baby because it's inconvenient is just murder.

User avatar
rusty
Posts: 5771
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2016 9:10 pm

Re: The intellectual dishonesty of Democrats

Postby rusty » Fri Oct 25, 2024 6:35 pm

I guess you would consider Cruz, Paxton, Abbott, and Patrick qualified to offer medical advice?

User avatar
Mark
Posts: 8570
Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 9:28 pm

Re: The intellectual dishonesty of Democrats

Postby Mark » Wed Oct 30, 2024 6:57 am

After seeing his newest ads on TV, I can declare with all confidence that Colin Allred is indeed a serial liar.
November 5, 2024: The day America got Her second chance.

User avatar
Mark
Posts: 8570
Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 9:28 pm

Re: The intellectual dishonesty of Democrats

Postby Mark » Wed Nov 06, 2024 9:16 am

So after flushing over $100 million on a campaign of lies, Commie Allred lost by a million votes to Ted Cruz. He didn't even come close to doing as well as Beto did.
November 5, 2024: The day America got Her second chance.


Return to “Your first forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 32 guests