Sangersteve wrote:Your "fake post" has a number of lies in it. Don't know where the lies came from but "poop!" Whether anyone likes it or not, those not blinded by 'fake' outrage know that Obama handed over high employments stats and the stimulus (according to those who know) worked.
I know you are comprehension intolerant, but even the dimmest bulb could see the story is attributed to the AP.
Now about the cost of the jobs created by the great and powerful O.
My cat has better math skills than anyone who would call O's stimulus a win.
When the Obama administration releases a report on the Friday before a long weekend, it’s clearly not trying to draw attention to the report’s contents. Sure enough, the “Seventh Quarterly Report” on the economic impact of the “stimulus,” released on Friday, July 1, provides further evidence that President Obama’s economic “stimulus” did very little, if anything, to stimulate the economy, and a whole lot to stimulate the debt.
The report was written by the White House’s Council of Economic Advisors, a group of three economists who were all handpicked by Obama, and it chronicles the alleged success of the “stimulus” in adding or saving jobs. The council reports that, using “mainstream estimates of economic multipliers for the effects of fiscal stimulus” (which it describes as a “natural way to estimate the effects of” the legislation), the “stimulus” has added or saved just under 2.4 million jobs — whether private or public — at a cost (to date) of $666 billion. That’s a cost to taxpayers of $278,000 per job.
In other words, the government could simply have cut a $100,000 check to everyone whose employment was allegedly made possible by the “stimulus,” and taxpayers would have come out $427 billion ahead.
Sorry, I know facts are a hard pill for liberals to swallow.
Don't you go to bed worrying about my comprehension level ... and it's repeated every time you open your yap that your comprehension of complex matters such as the so called stimulus ... that primarily saved Gen Motors (how much has it paid back?) ... was overall a criticaly important thing.
On this one issue, tho, I'm prepared to agree that there are several 'experts' who say one thing and some who say other things. How about you stick with you experts and I'll stick with mine and we will see, 'bout the time global warming is confirmed, how the stimulus is viewed..