Txdigest.com

--- http://abc13.com/3060796/ --- he is on the run .

I'm sick of hearing how immigrants commit fewer crimes than citizens. That's total crap, and it's droned on endlessly, every time an immigrant commits a horrible crime, which is pretty much every day.

What we do know for certain is that people who hate immigrants believe that they commit more crimes than non immigrants.

planosteve wrote:What we do know for certain is that people who hate immigrants believe that they commit more crimes than non immigrants.

--------------------------------------- .

For the record, an illegal alien is NOT an immigrant.

Mark wrote:For the record, an illegal alien is NOT an immigrant.

If you come to this country with the intention to stay permanently you are an immigrant. Legally or not.

Mark wrote:For the record, an illegal alien is NOT an immigrant.

--------------------------------------------------------- thanks for the accurate comment Mark .

planosteve wrote:

Mark wrote:For the record, an illegal alien is NOT an immigrant.

If you come to this country with the intention to stay permanently you are an immigrant. Legally or not.

----------------------------------------------- and some people also say that the ww2 'nazi' holocaust ' killing and wholesale murder of Jews [and others] never happened .

Mark wrote:For the record, an illegal alien is NOT an immigrant.

I agree..but lots of people will argue with you about that.

GFB wrote:

Mark wrote:For the record, an illegal alien is NOT an immigrant.

I agree..but lots of people will argue with you about that.

-------------------------- problem is , is when they are taken seriously Greg !!

Immigration is a process, and our Constitution dictates that congress will determine what the process is.

If a foreigner does not follow that process, then he/she is NOT an immigrant to this nation, by legal definition.


The Democrats had their opportunity to legally define an immigrant as anybody that shows up at our shores, but they chose not to do so.

There is a very good reason the Democrats don't want to be the party in charge when millions of illegal aliens are granted amnesty.

Mark wrote:Immigration is a process, and our Constitution dictates that congress will determine what the process is.

If a foreigner does not follow that process, then he/she is NOT an immigrant to this nation, by legal definition.


The Democrats had their opportunity to legally define an immigrant as anybody that shows up at our shores, but they chose not to do so.

There is a very good reason the Democrats don't want to be the party in charge when millions of illegal aliens are granted amnesty.

Well, your close, but no cigar.

The detailed enumeration of congressional powers in Article I of the Constitution does not include any power to restrict migration as such, even though it does include the power to make laws concerning the “naturalization” of foreigners and “regulate Commerce with foreign Nations.” The Naturalization Clause does not create a power to prevent foreigners from entering the country. It merely allows Congress to set conditions for the grant of citizenship.
https://openborders.info/blog/immigrati ... stitution/

planosteve wrote:

Mark wrote:Immigration is a process, and our Constitution dictates that congress will determine what the process is.

If a foreigner does not follow that process, then he/she is NOT an immigrant to this nation, by legal definition.


The Democrats had their opportunity to legally define an immigrant as anybody that shows up at our shores, but they chose not to do so.

There is a very good reason the Democrats don't want to be the party in charge when millions of illegal aliens are granted amnesty.

Well, your close, but no cigar.

The detailed enumeration of congressional powers in Article I of the Constitution does not include any power to restrict migration as such, even though it does include the power to make laws concerning the “naturalization” of foreigners and “regulate Commerce with foreign Nations.” The Naturalization Clause does not create a power to prevent foreigners from entering the country. It merely allows Congress to set conditions for the grant of citizenship.
https://openborders.info/blog/immigrati ... stitution/

You are going to use an extreme left wing whack job website to make your ridiculous point? Once again, you are FOS.

Mark wrote:

planosteve wrote:

Mark wrote:Immigration is a process, and our Constitution dictates that congress will determine what the process is.

If a foreigner does not follow that process, then he/she is NOT an immigrant to this nation, by legal definition.


The Democrats had their opportunity to legally define an immigrant as anybody that shows up at our shores, but they chose not to do so.

There is a very good reason the Democrats don't want to be the party in charge when millions of illegal aliens are granted amnesty.

Well, your close, but no cigar.

The detailed enumeration of congressional powers in Article I of the Constitution does not include any power to restrict migration as such, even though it does include the power to make laws concerning the “naturalization” of foreigners and “regulate Commerce with foreign Nations.” The Naturalization Clause does not create a power to prevent foreigners from entering the country. It merely allows Congress to set conditions for the grant of citizenship.
https://openborders.info/blog/immigrati ... stitution/

You are going to use an extreme left wing whack job website to make your ridiculous point? Once again, you are FOS.

Well yes. If I can't find an extreme right wing whack job website with the correct information, it will just have to do.

My information comes straight from Article I of the Constitution and your information comes from an extreme left wing whack job website.

Case closed.

Mark wrote:My information comes straight from Article I of the Constitution and your information comes from an extreme left wing whack job website.

Case closed.

If you look again, it's a libertarian website. Open borders is a concept accepted by most libertarians. As well as the founders. But, if you want to consider them extreme left wing whack jobs, you have ever right. It's still a free country. Mostly.

planosteve wrote:

Mark wrote:My information comes straight from Article I of the Constitution and your information comes from an extreme left wing whack job website.

Case closed.

If you look again, it's a libertarian website. Open borders is a concept accepted by most libertarians. But, if you want to consider them extreme left wing whack jobs, you have ever right. It's still a free country. Mostly.

If Libertarians are for open borders..yes, that's an extreme left wing whack job at my house.

planosteve wrote:

Mark wrote:My information comes straight from Article I of the Constitution and your information comes from an extreme left wing whack job website.

Case closed.

If you look again, it's a libertarian website. Open borders is a concept accepted by most libertarians. But, if you want to consider them extreme left wing whack jobs, you have ever right. It's still a free country. Mostly.

------------------------------------------------- yeah , open border libertarians are whack jobs .

As were the founders.

but when all is said and done and if a murder has to happen its always good to know and then advertise that an 'illegal alien' 'daca' type mexican / hispanic / latino did the murder .