Page 1 of 1
Code name "The Energizer".
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 1:15 pm
by Grassman
That's the secret services code name for Bill's nookie girl.
http://pagesix.com/2014/07/21/the-secre ... energizer/
Re: Code name "The Energizer".
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 1:37 pm
by BigTex
Kessler also reports that Hillary’s Secret Service detail informs Bill’s Secret Service detail when the former first lady is coming home, so Bill has time to get Energizer off the property and clean up any evidence.
gross
Re: Code name "The Energizer".
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 2:19 pm
by Grassman
BigTex wrote:Kessler also reports that Hillary’s Secret Service detail informs Bill’s Secret Service detail when the former first lady is coming home, so Bill has time to get Energizer off the property and clean up any evidence.
gross
You mean "launch"?
Re: Code name "The Energizer".
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 3:03 pm
by jellowrestling
Grassman wrote:BigTex wrote:Kessler also reports that Hillary’s Secret Service detail informs Bill’s Secret Service detail when the former first lady is coming home, so Bill has time to get Energizer off the property and clean up any evidence.
gross
You mean "launch"?
grosser
Re: Code name "The Energizer".
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 3:53 pm
by Dancer
Re: Code name "The Energizer".
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 3:56 pm
by Grassman
But, in Bill's defense have you seen that Hillary lately? Woof...
Re: Code name "The Energizer".
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 4:02 pm
by Dancer
Heard an interview with Fred Thompson the other day. He said the image makers would have her looking like a spring chicken by 2016. That is gonna be one horrifying chicken!
Re: Code name "The Energizer".
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 4:16 pm
by Bob Of Burleson
Hillary will never be nominated. Her sex and her age.
Re: Code name "The Energizer".
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 4:34 pm
by scarlett~nc
Re: Code name "The Energizer".
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 4:45 pm
by Bob Of Burleson
Elizabeth Warren,
Mitt Romney backers
won’t take no for an answer
By Matt Viser
The Boston Globe
WASHINGTON — Senator Elizabeth Warren and former governor Mitt Romney share little ground politically, but lately they have been repeating a common refrain: No.
Both insist — repeatedly — they have no intention of running for president in 2016. And given the half-century of failure of presidential aspirants from Massachusetts, perhaps that is the prudent course.
But those facts don’t matter to activists in both parties, who, hungering for alternatives to the current crop of potential 2016 candidates, are persistently trying to prod the reluctant contenders into the fray. With a widespread feeling that the current 2016 field is lacking, these supporters cite a longing for someone newer and more exciting (in the case of liberal Democrats and Warren) or someone older and more tested (in the case of establishment Republicans and Romney).
Some Republicans are unwilling to believe Romney’s repeated denials of interest, his insistence that his fizzled hopes in 2008 and his bitter defeat of 2012 were enough. To stand down, they will need to hear corroboration from his wife — the motivating force behind his past campaigns.
“Until Ann Romney looks me in the eye and says, ‘Jason, it’s not going to happen. Let’s stop doing that,’ I think there’s a remote possibility it might happen,” said Representative Jason Chaffetz, a Utah Republican and longtime Romney supporter.
The calls for Warren to run for the Democratic nomination reached a fevered pitch last week as she continued to campaign on behalf of Senate candidates around the country. After earlier trips to Minnesota, Oregon, Kentucky, and West Virginia, she arrived in Michigan to stump Thursday and then appear Friday before a lively bunch of liberal activists in Detroit.
“I’m going to give you the same answer I have given you many times,” she told the Globe in an interview. “There is no wiggle room. I am not running for president. No means no.”
[url=http://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2014/07/21/elizabeth-warren-and-mitt-romney-are-being-urged-jump-into-presidential-race-despite-repeated-disavowals/gkUPNZXCd22S27lef8BZYI/story.html]MORE[/ur
Re: Code name "The Energizer".
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 4:47 pm
by BillB
Bob Of Burleson wrote:Hillary will never be nominated. Her sex and her age.
I agree. I don't think her sex or age will hurt her but the vast catalog of her lies will sink her.
Re: Code name "The Energizer".
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 5:01 pm
by Bob Of Burleson
Oh, come on... When was there ever a major candidate in recent years (or perhaps anytime) who wasn't accused of lying? In politics, a lie is just a different interpretation of facts.
Re: Code name "The Energizer".
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 5:06 pm
by BillB
Bob Of Burleson wrote:Oh, come on... When was there ever a major candidate in recent years (or perhaps anytime) who wasn't accused of lying? In politics, a lie is just a different interpretation of facts.
Hillary is a pathological liar. She lies when there is no reason to lie. She can't help it.
Here are a few you may remember:
• Chelsea was jogging around the Trade Center on Sept. 11, 2001. (She was in bed watching it on TV.)
• Hillary was named after Sir Edmund Hillary. (She admitted she was wrong. He climbed Mt. Everest five years after her birth.)
• She was under sniper fire in Bosnia. (A girl presented her with flowers at the foot of the ramp.)
• She learned in The Wall Street Journal how to make a killing in the futures market. (It didn't cover the market back then.)
Re: Code name "The Energizer".
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 6:07 pm
by BigTex
Don't forget - the Clintons were broke when they left the White House.
Re: Code name "The Energizer".
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 9:46 pm
by PlanoSooner
Grassman wrote:But, in Bill's defense have you seen that Hillary lately? Woof...
she hasnt aged well
