Txdigest.com

I Am Part of the Resistance Inside the Trump Administration
I work for the president but like-minded colleagues and I have vowed to thwart parts of his agenda and his worst inclinations.
President Trump is facing a test to his presidency unlike any faced by a modern American leader.
It’s not just that the special counsel looms large. Or that the country is bitterly divided over Mr. Trump’s leadership. Or even that his party might well lose the House to an opposition hellbent on his downfall.
The dilemma — which he does not fully grasp — is that many of the senior officials in his own administration are working diligently from within to frustrate parts of his agenda and his worst inclinations.
I would know. I am one of them.
To be clear, ours is not the popular “resistance” of the left. We want the administration to succeed and think that many of its policies have already made America safer and more prosperous.
But we believe our first duty is to this country, and the president continues to act in a manner that is detrimental to the health of our republic.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/05/opin ... tance.html

Phone letter from NYT writer.

But either way who cares..just another loon with Trump Derangement Syndrome.

Everyone I know that supports Trump loves him more and more every day.

I think we're approaching 25th amendment territory.

Lawrence O'Donnell on MSNBC last night said who he thought the source was. He thinks it is Danial Coats, Diredtor of National Intelligence.

Dinesh D'Souza:

"Just read the anonymous @nytimes article and it’s blindingly obvious it’s an in-house product written not by any Trump official but by a professional writer at the newspaper itself. This is the very definition of #FakeNews"

Mark wrote:Dinesh D'Souza:

"Just read the anonymous @nytimes article and it’s blindingly obvious it’s an in-house product written not by any Trump official but by a professional writer at the newspaper itself. This is the very definition of #FakeNews"

Based on zero, zip, nada evidence.

Mark wrote:Dinesh D'Souza:

"Just read the anonymous @nytimes article and it’s blindingly obvious it’s an in-house product written not by any Trump official but by a professional writer at the newspaper itself. This is the very definition of #FakeNews"

I agree.

planosteve wrote:

Mark wrote:Dinesh D'Souza:

"Just read the anonymous @nytimes article and it’s blindingly obvious it’s an in-house product written not by any Trump official but by a professional writer at the newspaper itself. This is the very definition of #FakeNews"

Based on zero, zip, nada evidence.

D'Souza is not an "anonymous source". For all we know, it's another intern.

planosteve wrote:

Mark wrote:Dinesh D'Souza:

"Just read the anonymous @nytimes article and it’s blindingly obvious it’s an in-house product written not by any Trump official but by a professional writer at the newspaper itself. This is the very definition of #FakeNews"

Based on zero, zip, nada evidence.

I've never seen anyone but journalists (or first-graders) write in one-sentence paragraphs. Have you?

planosteve wrote:

Mark wrote:Dinesh D'Souza:

"Just read the anonymous @nytimes article and it’s blindingly obvious it’s an in-house product written not by any Trump official but by a professional writer at the newspaper itself. This is the very definition of #FakeNews"

Based on zero, zip, nada evidence.

At least as much evidence as that it came from someone inside the White House.

GFB wrote:

planosteve wrote:

Mark wrote:Dinesh D'Souza:

"Just read the anonymous @nytimes article and it’s blindingly obvious it’s an in-house product written not by any Trump official but by a professional writer at the newspaper itself. This is the very definition of #FakeNews"

Based on zero, zip, nada evidence.

At least as much evidence as that it came from someone inside the White House.

You believe if it wasn't, that the NYT would have published it?

The NYT would publish a front page menudo recipe, if it was called "Trump hates mexicans menudo"

planosteve wrote:

GFB wrote:

planosteve wrote:Based on zero, zip, nada evidence.

At least as much evidence as that it came from someone inside the White House.

You believe if it wasn't, that the NYT would have published it?

Is that a serious question?

Without corroboration, one anonymous source is hearsay. IMO.

BigTex wrote:Without corroboration, one anonymous source is hearsay. IMO.

Woodward's book corroborates it.

Anonymous Txdigest.com insider reports that planosteve is nuts.

jellowrestling wrote:Anonymous Txdigest.com insider reports that planosteve is nuts.

------------------------------------- !!!!!!!

jellowrestling wrote:Anonymous Txdigest.com insider reports that planosteve is nuts.

Ok..you got me.

We'll see who's nuts in a couple months.

I say that "Anonymous" is GregFromBurbank.