Txdigest.com

--- https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump- ... itizenship ---

Great..was always an abomination.

it'll be struck down i figger but might show some voters that TRUMP Heart is in the right place Greg .

Trump lied again during the HBO interview.

He claims this country is the only country the gives citizenship to anyone born here.

Rafael knows he lied, he gave up his Canadian citizenship birth right 4 years ago;




While at home in Houston on Tuesday, Cruz was notified by mail that the renunciation became official on May 14, The Dallas Morning News reports.

“He’s pleased to receive the notification and glad to have this process finalized,” spokeswoman Catherine Frazier said.

Cruz intended to give up his Canadian citizenship, which was not a secret, after The Dallas Morning News first brought it to his attention — to the surprise of him and his family — last August.

“Nothing against Canada, but I’m an American by birth and as a U.S. senator, I believe I should be only an American,” said Cruz, who was born in the Canadian province of Alberta, at the time.

Like U.S. law, Canadian law dictates that anyone born in Canada becomes a Canadian citizen automatically. Babies born in non-U.S. countries to at least one American parent are entitled to American citizenship as well. The U.S. Constitution requires presidents to be “natural born” citizens, which is commonly believed to include Americans born with the right to citizenship, even if they were not born on American soil specifically.

http://time.com/2854513/ted-cruz-canadian-citizenship/

i think and hope that this EO and then the ongoing invasion by Columns of third worlders invading the USA should help the TRUMP out for the Elections . What else can i get the Trump to do . Maybe abolish or forbid recorded messages from asking which language a person in America prefers [press 1 or 2 ] .

John in Plano wrote:Trump lied again during the HBO interview.

He claims this country is the only country the gives citizenship to anyone born here.

Rafael knows he lied, he gave up his Canadian citizenship birth right 4 years ago;




While at home in Houston on Tuesday, Cruz was notified by mail that the renunciation became official on May 14, The Dallas Morning News reports.

“He’s pleased to receive the notification and glad to have this process finalized,” spokeswoman Catherine Frazier said.

Cruz intended to give up his Canadian citizenship, which was not a secret, after The Dallas Morning News first brought it to his attention — to the surprise of him and his family — last August.

“Nothing against Canada, but I’m an American by birth and as a U.S. senator, I believe I should be only an American,” said Cruz, who was born in the Canadian province of Alberta, at the time.

Like U.S. law, Canadian law dictates that anyone born in Canada becomes a Canadian citizen automatically. Babies born in non-U.S. countries to at least one American parent are entitled to American citizenship as well. The U.S. Constitution requires presidents to be “natural born” citizens, which is commonly believed to include Americans born with the right to citizenship, even if they were not born on American soil specifically.

http://time.com/2854513/ted-cruz-canadian-citizenship/

So, are you in favor of anchor babies?..or would you like to see this idea go away.

An EO is the wrong way to address any thing in the Constitution.

John in Plano wrote:An EO is the wrong way to address any thing in the Constitution.

So, are you in favor of anchor babies?..or would you like to see this idea go away.

GFB wrote:

John in Plano wrote:An EO is the wrong way to address any thing in the Constitution.

So, are you in favor of anchor babies?..or would you like to see this idea go away.

If the states want to change the Constitution I have no problem.

So he thinks he can override the Constitution with an executive order. This is the sort of thing that will make even Trump's supporters dump him.

John in Plano wrote:

GFB wrote:

John in Plano wrote:An EO is the wrong way to address any thing in the Constitution.

So, are you in favor of anchor babies?..or would you like to see this idea go away.

If the states want to change the Constitution I have no problem.

See, this is why Trump got elected..spine and guts.

You are not atypical, most people have a problem expressing their opinions on sensitive subjects..just like you do.

We just got tired of our Republican Presidents being spineless and gutless.

Kiamichi wrote:So he thinks he can override the Constitution with an executive order. This is the sort of thing that will make even Trump's supporters dump him.

You have no idea how clueless you are on this.

As Rush would say..”This is what pushback looks like.”

And as Andy McCarthy said..probably not an exact quote,..”If you want to change things in Washington, you’d better be ready to break some furniture.”

Kiamichi wrote:So he thinks he can override the Constitution with an executive order. This is the sort of thing that will make even Trump's supporters dump him.

------------------------------------------- its my opinion that the EO talk is designed to rally Trump voters and that all it is . Trump knows that this EO probably won't work but it shows Deplorables and on the fence Deplorables that Trumps heart is in the right place Kiamichi .

GFB wrote:

John in Plano wrote:

GFB wrote:
So, are you in favor of anchor babies?..or would you like to see this idea go away.

If the states want to change the Constitution I have no problem.

See, this is why Trump got elected..spine and guts.

You are not atypical, most people have a problem expressing their opinions on sensitive subjects..just like you do.

We just got tired of our Republican Presidents being spineless and gutless.

It's beyond stupid to use Executive Order to change words or meanings of the Constitution.

2nd would be the first thing changed via EO by the next anti gun President elected.

Clear enough Greg.

We'll see how far "spine and guts" combined with stupidity will get you in about 2 weeks.

planosteve wrote:We'll see how far "spine and guts" combined with stupidity will get you in about 2 weeks.

---------------------------------------------- election will be over with by then and then the TRUMP is supposed to get going on more 'anchor baby' action PSteve .

John in Plano wrote:

GFB wrote:

John in Plano wrote:
If the states want to change the Constitution I have no problem.

See, this is why Trump got elected..spine and guts.

You are not atypical, most people have a problem expressing their opinions on sensitive subjects..just like you do.

We just got tired of our Republican Presidents being spineless and gutless.

It's beyond stupid to use Executive Order to change words or meanings of the Constitution.

2nd would be the first thing changed via EO by the next anti gun President elected.

Trump will win the 14th amendment argument in the Supreme Court.

It’s called original intent..which was not about illegal aliens..it was about slaves..and their children.

GFB wrote:
Trump will win the 14th amendment argument in the Supreme Court.

It’s called original intent..which was not about illegal aliens..it was about slaves..and their children.

Spot on. "Subject to the jurisdiction thereof" is the key phrase in the 14th Amendment that everybody on the Left conveniently ignores.

GFB wrote:

John in Plano wrote:

GFB wrote:
See, this is why Trump got elected..spine and guts.

You are not atypical, most people have a problem expressing their opinions on sensitive subjects..just like you do.

We just got tired of our Republican Presidents being spineless and gutless.

It's beyond stupid to use Executive Order to change words or meanings of the Constitution.

2nd would be the first thing changed via EO by the next anti gun President elected.

Trump will win the 14th amendment argument in the Supreme Court.

It’s called original intent..which was not about illegal aliens..it was about slaves..and their children.

I have read the Congressional Record transcripts of the debate in Congress about this amendment and they made it perfectly plain that it applied to all children born to foreigners in the United States, even to what they considered undesirables at the time, namely Gypsies and Chinese. The part about "subject to its jurisdiction" referred to American Indians who belonged to tribes which were considered sovereign and whose relations with the federal government were covered by treaties.