Judge: DC ban on handguns unconstitutional

[Bob Of Burleson]

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A federal judge on Saturday overturned Washington D.C.'s ban on carrying handguns outside the home, saying it was unconstitutional.

"There is no longer any basis on which this Court can conclude that the District of Columbia's total ban on the public carrying of ready-to-use handguns outside the home is constitutional under any level of scrutiny," Judge Frederick Scullin said in an opinion.

"Therefore, the Court finds that the District of Columbia's complete ban on the carrying of handguns in public is unconstitutional," he added in his 19-page ruling.

The court ordered the city to allow residents to carry handguns outside their homes and to let non-residents carry them as well.

Scullin made the ruling in the PALMER et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al case, which has been dragging on for five years.

In 2008, the Supreme Court struck down D.C.'s all-out ban on handguns on the basis that it violated the right to bear arms guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution's Second Amendment.

An appeals court in 2011 required handguns to be registered.

SOURCE

[GFB]

..if ever there was a place people need to carry.

[Just Me]

and the usual appeal is coming....

D.C. attorney general plans to seek stay of ruling overturning District’s handgun ban

[BillB]

and the usual appeal is coming....

D.C. attorney general plans to seek stay of ruling overturning District’s handgun ban

I hope they appeal it. Right now they are just asking for a stay.
This case needs to reach SCOTUS before Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, Kennedy or Alito leave the court.
If they are all still there, the decision will be upheld. If one of them is gone, it wont be.

Scalia is 78 years old and weighs about 300 lbs.