Page 1 of 1

Matthew McConaughey

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2022 7:14 am
by Mark
Make no mistake, this ass clown is just another Hollywood gun grabber. After you cut through all his bullshit, all he wants to do is disarm Americans and undermine the second amendment.

Remember, he was thrust into the spotlight yesterday by the Brandon Administration. They didn't put him there to defend the second amendment.

Re: Matthew McConaughey

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2022 8:03 am
by grouchy
Mark wrote:Make no mistake, this ass clown is just another Hollywood gun grabber. After you cut through all his bullshit, all he wants to do is disarm Americans and undermine the second amendment.

Remember, he was thrust into the spotlight yesterday by the Brandon Administration. They didn't put him there to defend the second amendment.

Sir, I am not saying that you are wrong, but I have some questions. Uvalde and Sulphur Springs are both towns with populations around 16,000.
How would you feel if it had occurred in your town? If some of the victims were related to your friends? If you had known one of the teachers?
Some of those kids could only be identified thru DNA testing. What if one of them was your granddaughter?

Re: Matthew McConaughey

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2022 9:06 am
by rusty
grouchy wrote:
Mark wrote:Make no mistake, this ass clown is just another Hollywood gun grabber. After you cut through all his bullshit, all he wants to do is disarm Americans and undermine the second amendment.

Remember, he was thrust into the spotlight yesterday by the Brandon Administration. They didn't put him there to defend the second amendment.

Sir, I am not saying that you are wrong, but I have some questions. Uvalde and Sulphur Springs are both towns with populations around 16,000.
How would you feel if it had occurred in your town? If some of the victims were related to your friends? If you had known one of the teachers?
Some of those kids could only be identified thru DNA testing. What if one of them was your granddaughter?


Grouchy they have to protect their "rights" at any cost. Including the lives of innocent people.
It's basically not about rights anyway, if it was they would support all of our Constitutional rights and not cherry pick the one that makes their man parts all tingly.

Re: Matthew McConaughey

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2022 10:53 am
by GFB
Mark wrote:Make no mistake, this ass clown is just another Hollywood gun grabber. After you cut through all his bullshit, all he wants to do is disarm Americans and undermine the second amendment.

Remember, he was thrust into the spotlight yesterday by the Brandon Administration. They didn't put him there to defend the second amendment.


You’re right..total loser.

Re: Matthew McConaughey

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2022 10:55 am
by Mark
Disarming law-abiding citizens doesn't do one thing to stop crime. In fact, it promotes crime.

These dumbass Leftists truly are stupid.

Re: Matthew McConaughey

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2022 10:57 am
by GFB
When leftist politicians are at their most insane, they ask the question..

“How many children have to die before you’ll give up the second amendment.”

Since this question is nonsensical..(as if all children are in danger from crazed people..)

..the correct answer that will shut them up permanently..

“All of them..and all of you politicians as well.”

Re: Matthew McConaughey

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2022 11:17 am
by GRANDPA
Once one right is taken away, the others are sure to follow.

Re: Matthew McConaughey

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2022 5:36 pm
by grouchy
grouchy wrote:
Mark wrote:Make no mistake, this ass clown is just another Hollywood gun grabber. After you cut through all his bullshit, all he wants to do is disarm Americans and undermine the second amendment.

Remember, he was thrust into the spotlight yesterday by the Brandon Administration. They didn't put him there to defend the second amendment.

Sir, I am not saying that you are wrong, but I have some questions. Uvalde and Sulphur Springs are both towns with populations around 16,000.
How would you feel if it had occurred in your town? If some of the victims were related to your friends? If you had known one of the teachers?
Some of those kids could only be identified thru DNA testing. What if one of them was your granddaughter?

Sir?

Re: Matthew McConaughey

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2022 5:59 pm
by grouchy
GRANDPA wrote:Once one right is taken away, the others are sure to follow.

Sir, I do not advocate stopping the sales of AR-15s.

Re: Matthew McConaughey

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2022 6:26 pm
by Sangersteve
Sir, I am not saying that you are wrong, but I have some questions. Uvalde and Sulphur Springs are both towns with populations around 16,000.
How would you feel if it had occurred in your town? If some of the victims were related to your friends? If you had known one of the teachers?
Some of those kids could only be identified thru DNA testing. What if one of them was your granddaughter?


Valid question.

My answer would be, I'd be horrified and probably want an eye for an eye.

I'd want an answer as to why someone that misguided was allowed loose in public.

I can blame the person or the missed clues that a person could do it.

I can not blame the tool that was used.

Be it a gun, knife, bomb or SUV.

Re: Matthew McConaughey

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2022 6:30 pm
by rusty
Sangersteve wrote:
Sir, I am not saying that you are wrong, but I have some questions. Uvalde and Sulphur Springs are both towns with populations around 16,000.
How would you feel if it had occurred in your town? If some of the victims were related to your friends? If you had known one of the teachers?
Some of those kids could only be identified thru DNA testing. What if one of them was your granddaughter?


Valid question.

My answer would be, I'd be horrified and probably want an eye for an eye.

I'd want an answer as to why someone that misguided was allowed loose in public.

I can blame the person or the missed clues that a person could do it.

I can not blame the tool that was used.

Be it a gun, knife, bomb or SUV.


If your kid was caught beating someone with a baseball bat, you wouldn't blame the bat. But you'd probably take it away.

Re: Matthew McConaughey

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2022 6:32 pm
by Sangersteve
Grouchy they have to protect their "rights" at any cost. Including the lives of innocent people.
It's basically not about rights anyway, if it was they would support all of our Constitutional rights and not cherry pick the one that makes their man parts all tingly.


They are all of our rights.

Can you name one constitutional right not supported?

Think before you bring up Roe V. Wade

Re: Matthew McConaughey

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2022 6:34 pm
by Sangersteve
If your kid was caught beating someone with a baseball bat, you wouldn't blame the bat. But you'd probably take it away.


And if I caught someone breaking the law with any instrument I'd take it away.

Just not before a crime was committed.

Re: Matthew McConaughey

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2022 7:39 pm
by rusty
Sangersteve wrote:
If your kid was caught beating someone with a baseball bat, you wouldn't blame the bat. But you'd probably take it away.


And if I caught someone breaking the law with any instrument I'd take it away.

Just not before a crime was committed.


Unfortunately, that’s usually too late, isn’t it?

“Well, he killed 22 people. I guess we should take his weapons away.”

Re: Matthew McConaughey

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2022 8:01 pm
by Sangersteve
Unfortunately, that’s usually too late, isn’t it?

“Well, he killed 22 people. I guess we should take his weapons away.”


Tell me what tool or law will allow government to determine a crime is about to be committed?

Re: Matthew McConaughey

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2022 8:30 pm
by zoomzoomklunk
If your kid was caught beating someone with a baseball bat, you wouldn't blame the bat. But you'd probably take it away.[/quote]
Until he learned the proper use of a baseball bat.

Re: Matthew McConaughey

Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2022 6:56 pm
by planosteve
No kid anywhere near "normal" does what this kid did. Focusing on his gun is a total waste of time. Pay attention to why he was abnormal instead.