NJ massacres an estimated 1,000 waiting in line for food!
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2024 8:36 pm
Just some friends talking
http://txdigest.com/txdigest/
GRANDPA wrote:Twitter - that's a reliable, balanced source. You might as well start citing Facebook, too. Of course, I've seen some of the other stuff you post, too.
GRANDPA wrote:Twitter - that's a reliable, balanced source. You might as well start citing Facebook, too. Of course, I've seen some of the other stuff you post, too.
planosteve wrote:https://twitter.com/RamAbdu/status/1763214973398880531?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1763214973398880531%7Ctwgr%5E4ada1de18985fad4cc1338f00df5b2486a5aaa14%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.unz.com%2Faanglin%2Fjew-monsters-open-fire-on-gazans-waiting-in-line-for-food-slaughter-more-than-100-people%2F
GFB wrote:planosteve wrote:https://twitter.com/RamAbdu/status/1763214973398880531?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1763214973398880531%7Ctwgr%5E4ada1de18985fad4cc1338f00df5b2486a5aaa14%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.unz.com%2Faanglin%2Fjew-monsters-open-fire-on-gazans-waiting-in-line-for-food-slaughter-more-than-100-people%2F
Unless a person is incredibly naive, a headline that signals the “Israelis target civilians”..that person already knows it’s complete BS.
GRANDPA wrote:"Yeah, well I guess they could have just been out for morning target practice and all of these uninvited Gazans were in the way.![]()
"
And that's exactly how the sources you follow would spin that.
GFB wrote:planosteve wrote:https://twitter.com/RamAbdu/status/1763214973398880531?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1763214973398880531%7Ctwgr%5E4ada1de18985fad4cc1338f00df5b2486a5aaa14%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.unz.com%2Faanglin%2Fjew-monsters-open-fire-on-gazans-waiting-in-line-for-food-slaughter-more-than-100-people%2F
Unless a person is incredibly naive, a headline that signals the “Israelis target civilians”..that person already knows it’s complete BS.
jellowrestling wrote:GFB wrote:planosteve wrote:https://twitter.com/RamAbdu/status/1763214973398880531?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1763214973398880531%7Ctwgr%5E4ada1de18985fad4cc1338f00df5b2486a5aaa14%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.unz.com%2Faanglin%2Fjew-monsters-open-fire-on-gazans-waiting-in-line-for-food-slaughter-more-than-100-people%2F
Unless a person is incredibly naive, a headline that signals the “Israelis target civilians”..that person already knows it’s complete BS.
+1
jellowrestling wrote:GFB wrote:planosteve wrote:https://twitter.com/RamAbdu/status/1763214973398880531?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1763214973398880531%7Ctwgr%5E4ada1de18985fad4cc1338f00df5b2486a5aaa14%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.unz.com%2Faanglin%2Fjew-monsters-open-fire-on-gazans-waiting-in-line-for-food-slaughter-more-than-100-people%2F
Unless a person is incredibly naive, a headline that signals the “Israelis target civilians”..that person already knows it’s complete BS.
+1
planosteve wrote:jellowrestling wrote:GFB wrote:
Unless a person is incredibly naive, a headline that signals the “Israelis target civilians”..that person already knows it’s complete BS.
+1jellowrestling wrote:GFB wrote:
Unless a person is incredibly naive, a headline that signals the “Israelis target civilians”..that person already knows it’s complete BS.
+1
Twitter is not "News" Media like The New York Times. It's "Social" media. It doesn't have headlines. You don't pay for it. It doesn't have to worry about reputation. It's somebody's brain fart. Do you understand what the difference is?
GFB wrote:planosteve wrote:jellowrestling wrote:+1jellowrestling wrote:+1
Twitter is not "News" Media like The New York Times. It's "Social" media. It doesn't have headlines. You don't pay for it. It doesn't have to worry about reputation. It's somebody's brain fart. Do you understand what the difference is?
Yes, it means..in Twitter..mixed in with people with crazy opinions and heavily biased comments, you can actually find some truth, reality, and legitimate news.
None of that is available in the New York Times.