Ron Paul tells Tucker the day we lost our government
Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2024 6:12 pm
Just some friends talking
http://txdigest.com/txdigest/
GRANDPA wrote::?: ???? YouTube doesn't need your email or phone number to watch. You're just being obtuse. Just as you claim any video, or in this case, film can be manipulated, so can any photograph. They can even put Oswald in a red & white striped shirt & move him from the sixth floor to the ground floor entrance.
GRANDPA wrote:I'm almost surprised you didn't mention a B-52 circling overhead to drop a nuke on Dallas in case all shooters missed. No one can invent any conspiracy theory so obviously ridiculous & satirical that some people (like you) somewhere don't already believe it. No doubt you think, given the number of flowers thrown at her hearse during the funeral, Princess Diana was murdered by florists who wanted to boost sales.
planosteve wrote:And now we have a brand new book that blows the doors off the coverup!
What distinguishes this book from the myriad of books written on the JFK assassination is that Dr. Mantik’s optical density measurements of the JFK skull X-rays in the National Archives leave no doubt the X-rays were altered to disguise evidence of the two frontal shots. With over four decades of experience reading X-rays, Dr. Mantik has examined the JFK assassination materials more than anyone else.
https://www.amazon.com/Assassination-Pr ... B0CXLN1PX1
GFB wrote:planosteve wrote:And now we have a brand new book that blows the doors off the coverup!
What distinguishes this book from the myriad of books written on the JFK assassination is that Dr. Mantik’s optical density measurements of the JFK skull X-rays in the National Archives leave no doubt the X-rays were altered to disguise evidence of the two frontal shots. With over four decades of experience reading X-rays, Dr. Mantik has examined the JFK assassination materials more than anyone else.
https://www.amazon.com/Assassination-Pr ... B0CXLN1PX1
In your last post, you went on and on about how you didn’t write the book, and you are not even sure if you’ll agree with it.
Now there is “no doubt” that there was “altered evidence of two frontal shots”.
GRANDPA wrote:it’s especially hard to change a conspiracy theorist’s mind, because their theories are “self-sealing,” in that even absence of evidence for the theory becomes evidence for the theory. That is, the reason there’s no proof of the conspiracy, the thinking goes, is because the conspirators did such a good job of covering it up.
GRANDPA wrote:Are you sure? Maybe that's just what they want you to think.
planosteve wrote:GRANDPA wrote:Are you sure? Maybe that's just what they want you to think.
Why do you think the CIA cares what I think?
GRANDPA wrote:planosteve wrote:GRANDPA wrote:Are you sure? Maybe that's just what they want you to think.
Why do you think the CIA cares what I think?
Why do you think they don't?
planosteve wrote:GRANDPA wrote:planosteve wrote:Why do you think the CIA cares what I think?
Why do you think they don't?
Because they never heard of me.
GRANDPA wrote:planosteve wrote:GRANDPA wrote:Why do you think they don't?
Because they never heard of me.
Are you sure? Just because the law says they're not supposed to spy on American citizens domestically, doesn't mean they don't.
planosteve wrote:GRANDPA wrote:planosteve wrote:Because they never heard of me.
Are you sure? Just because the law says they're not supposed to spy on American citizens domestically, doesn't mean they don't.
I don't loose any sleep over it.