Txdigest.com

His Mara Logo trial has been postponed. Otherwise, there's no way he could run for president because he is totally guilty and has no legitimate excuses for what he did.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics ... r-BB1lZqks

Several of the more sane people tried to tell you this two days ago..it was known.

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=21013

The FBI tampered with evidence, so yeah some inveswtigation needs to be done.

The case in Georgia is radially blowing up, also.

Ditto for the case in D.C.

The ridiculous fiasco going on in New York right now, is the only trial that is actually going through this year. It will be over in two weeks, then Trump is free and clear.

GFB wrote:The case in Georgia is radially blowing up, also.

Ditto for the case in D.C.

The ridiculous fiasco going on in New York right now, is the only trial that is actually going through this year. It will be over in two weeks, then Trump is free and clear.

Or headed for prison.

Mara Lago is the biggie. There is no excuse for what he did and no doubt that he did it. Guilty, 1st degree. The only thing in doubt is what his sentence will be. And it he's elected president he can probably kill it.

planosteve wrote:Guilty, 1st degree.

Of what?

Mark wrote:

planosteve wrote:Guilty, 1st degree.

Of what?

Trump was charged in an indictment unsealed Friday with 37 criminal counts for charges including violations of the Espionage Act, conspiracy to obstruct justice, and making false statements to investigators.

planosteve wrote:

Mark wrote:

planosteve wrote:Guilty, 1st degree.

Of what?

Trump was charged in an indictment unsealed Friday with 37 criminal counts for charges including violations of the Espionage Act, conspiracy to obstruct justice, and making false statements to investigators.

Then you learned here that evidence was tampered with.

It's an open and shut case. He either did it or he didn't. Since there is no evidence he didn't, he's guilty. I can't imagine how he would try to justify it.

planosteve wrote:Since there is no evidence he didn't, he's guilty.

You've got it exactly backwards there.

Mark wrote:

planosteve wrote:Since there is no evidence he didn't, he's guilty.

You've got it exactly backwards there.

Explain please.

planosteve wrote:

Mark wrote:

planosteve wrote:Since there is no evidence he didn't, he's guilty.

You've got it exactly backwards there.

Explain please.

Have you ever heard the phrase

Innocent until proven guilty

Sangersteve wrote:

planosteve wrote:

Mark wrote:

You've got it exactly backwards there.

Explain please.

Have you ever heard the phrase

Innocent until proven guilty

All of the known evidence points to guilty. The only way he skates is if he can get elected before he's sentenced.

Prosecutors pushed for a December 2023 trial start date. Trump wanted it to begin later — ostensibly because his legal team needed time to review evidence, but clearly, in part, because it wanted to push the trial past the presidential election. Cannon opted for May 2024 but hinted even in November that she might push it out further.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... rial-date/

planosteve wrote:

All of the known evidence points to guilty. The only way he skates is if he can get elected before he's sentenced.

Oh? Sorry I didn't know you were part of the prosecuters team.

The team that admitted to tampering with evidence

Which lead the judge to postphone the trial.

So was it you that staged the photographs?

Or were you the one that rearainged the evidence?

Or maybe you were the one who has seen nothing and just reads biased news?

Sangersteve wrote:planosteve wrote:

All of the known evidence points to guilty. The only way he skates is if he can get elected before he's sentenced.

Oh? Sorry I didn't know you were part of the prosecuters team.

The team that admitted to tampering with evidence

Which lead the judge to postphone the trial.

So was it you that staged the photographs?

Or were you the one that rearainged the evidence?

Or maybe you were the one who has seen nothing and just reads biased news?

Just my opinion as a 5 year active duty military officer with a top secret clearance. And so what are your creds? sir?
Hmmmmmmm?

planosteve wrote:

Sangersteve wrote:planosteve wrote:

All of the known evidence points to guilty. The only way he skates is if he can get elected before he's sentenced.

Oh? Sorry I didn't know you were part of the prosecuters team.

The team that admitted to tampering with evidence

Which lead the judge to postphone the trial.

So was it you that staged the photographs?

Or were you the one that rearainged the evidence?

Or maybe you were the one who has seen nothing and just reads biased news?

Just my opinion as a 5 year active duty military officer with a top secret clearance. And so what are your creds? sir?
Hmmmmmmm?

Not a dipshit?

GFB wrote:

planosteve wrote:

Sangersteve wrote:planosteve wrote:



Oh? Sorry I didn't know you were part of the prosecuters team.

The team that admitted to tampering with evidence

Which lead the judge to postphone the trial.

So was it you that staged the photographs?

Or were you the one that rearainged the evidence?

Or maybe you were the one who has seen nothing and just reads biased news?

Just my opinion as a 5 year active duty military officer with a top secret clearance. And so what are your creds? sir?
Hmmmmmmm?

Not a dipshit?

Your credentials were established here a long long time ago and haven't changed one iota.

planosteve wrote:

Just my opinion as a 5 year active duty military officer with a top secret clearance. And so what are your creds? sir?
Hmmmmmmm?

So you aren't a member of the team that screwed up the evidence.

Your opinion is just as valuable as all the gold you don't own.

All that military experience didn't teach you that "beyond a reasonable doubt" has to be proven, not opined upon.

My creds are the ability to understand the law.