Public records, why do the courts want them hidden?
Posted: Sun Jun 16, 2024 8:56 am
No not Creepy Joe.
Audrey Hale.
A judge seems displeased some have been leaked.
They are public records.
Most mass murderers have a manifesto as to why they did what they did.
The murders were very public, why shouldn't we know her reasons.
Due to some leaked stuff the public does know some things.
So the judge is going after the reporter.
https://tcog.info/the-problem-with-the- ... nant-case/
Audrey Hale.
A judge seems displeased some have been leaked.
They are public records.
Most mass murderers have a manifesto as to why they did what they did.
The murders were very public, why shouldn't we know her reasons.
Due to some leaked stuff the public does know some things.
So the judge is going after the reporter.
Now, however, as everyone has been awaiting a long-overdue ruling, the chancellor has turned her attention to a leak of police records to a local conservative news website, The Tennessee Star. She is clearly hot about it.
On Monday, she ordered Tennessee Star Editor Michael Patrick Leahy, the editor and owner of Star News Digital Media, one of the four plaintiffs in the case, to appear personally in court on June 17 and show in a “show cause hearing” why his “publication” of articles based on leaked documents “does not” subject him to contempt proceedings and sanctions.
Today, a Nashville police lieutenant delivered a declaration to the court suggesting the leaker is former lieutenant Garet Davidson, who also just happened to file a big complaint against his former employer.
The problem with the court’s witch hunt is that truthful information about the Covenant shooting is being reported to the public from records that should already be public and that the public has a right to know.
https://tcog.info/the-problem-with-the- ... nant-case/