Get Your Flu Shot Yet?
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2014 4:37 pm
Vaccine for a disease that doesn't exist?
By Jon Rappoport
November 12, 2014
www.nomorefakenews.com
Would they push a vaccine for a disease that doesn't exist?
Would they try to force it on people? Fire health workers who wouldn't take it?
Let me put the question in a slightly different way: Would they push a vaccine for a disease where the overwhelming number of diagnosed cases are false?
Here's a citation: Peter Doshi, " Influenza: marketing vaccines by marketing disease" (BMJ 2013; 346:f3037):
"...few people realize that even the ideal influenza vaccine, matched perfectly to circulating strains of wild influenza and capable of stopping all influenza viruses, can only deal with a small part of the 'flu' problem...Every year, hundreds of thousands of respiratory specimens are tested across the US. Of those tested, on average 16% are found to be influenza positive....It's no wonder so many people feel that 'flu shots' don't work: for most flus, they can't."
Even if you believe that vaccines work, do what they're supposed to do, create genuine immunity, the government is pushing a flu vaccine that, in at least 84% percent of "flu cases," couldn't work, because those people don't have the flu.
This is called a clue.
It tells you that vaccines don't need to be relevant to human disease. They're products. The authorities buy them, promote them, help sell them.
In past articles on Ebola, I've pointed out that the standard diagnostic tests (antibody and PCR) fail to properly ID anyone as "Ebola."
On top of that, you can bet that most "Ebola cases" in West Africa are diagnosed without tests, but instead by eyeball, when general symptoms are present---symptoms which can be caused by any number of factors.So when the Ebola vaccine comes along, we'll see a situation at least as ridiculous as the flu fiasco I described above.
And when you add in very real dangers---unknown genes inserted in the vaccines, a chimp or rabies virus carrying those genes and potentially reproducing and spreading in the body, toxic chemicals added to the vaccine as preservatives and "promoters of potency," and who knows what else folded into the vaccine---you have a disaster waiting to happen.
Jon Rappoport
By Jon Rappoport
November 12, 2014
www.nomorefakenews.com
Would they push a vaccine for a disease that doesn't exist?
Would they try to force it on people? Fire health workers who wouldn't take it?
Let me put the question in a slightly different way: Would they push a vaccine for a disease where the overwhelming number of diagnosed cases are false?
Here's a citation: Peter Doshi, " Influenza: marketing vaccines by marketing disease" (BMJ 2013; 346:f3037):
"...few people realize that even the ideal influenza vaccine, matched perfectly to circulating strains of wild influenza and capable of stopping all influenza viruses, can only deal with a small part of the 'flu' problem...Every year, hundreds of thousands of respiratory specimens are tested across the US. Of those tested, on average 16% are found to be influenza positive....It's no wonder so many people feel that 'flu shots' don't work: for most flus, they can't."
Even if you believe that vaccines work, do what they're supposed to do, create genuine immunity, the government is pushing a flu vaccine that, in at least 84% percent of "flu cases," couldn't work, because those people don't have the flu.
This is called a clue.
It tells you that vaccines don't need to be relevant to human disease. They're products. The authorities buy them, promote them, help sell them.
In past articles on Ebola, I've pointed out that the standard diagnostic tests (antibody and PCR) fail to properly ID anyone as "Ebola."
On top of that, you can bet that most "Ebola cases" in West Africa are diagnosed without tests, but instead by eyeball, when general symptoms are present---symptoms which can be caused by any number of factors.So when the Ebola vaccine comes along, we'll see a situation at least as ridiculous as the flu fiasco I described above.
And when you add in very real dangers---unknown genes inserted in the vaccines, a chimp or rabies virus carrying those genes and potentially reproducing and spreading in the body, toxic chemicals added to the vaccine as preservatives and "promoters of potency," and who knows what else folded into the vaccine---you have a disaster waiting to happen.
Jon Rappoport