Txdigest.com

There will be several hundred more.
I just read he settled big money on a woman as recently as 2005.
The trailer parks are emptying out headed for lawyer offices.

BillB wrote:There will be several hundred more.
I just read he settled big money on a woman as recently as 2005.
The trailer parks are emptying out headed for lawyer offices.

Seems like mostly a bunch of starlets..no trailer park dwellers.

..and have any asked for money?

According to news today he was paying the $2, 000/month to stay silent.

so many, before Viagra. Just what was he taking.

I hope this is not misunderstood....but I just can't understand how not even one of the victims weren't willing to take him to court in order to stop him from him from raping more. Is Cosby THAT intimidating? Does $$$$ talk that loud?

crocmommy wrote:I hope this is not misunderstood....but I just can't understand how not even one of the victims weren't willing to take him to court in order to stop him from him from raping more. Is Cosby THAT intimidating? Does $$$$ talk that loud?

maybe not money as much as power in the 1950, 1960's .. I had a lawyer I worked for in 1th 60's that fired me because I would not have sex with him, I never reported him , just left the job and never said a word to anyone thinking no one would believe my word against a powerful lawyer ..I was 18 he was in his 40's ..it happens

crocmommy wrote:I hope this is not misunderstood....but I just can't understand how not even one of the victims weren't willing to take him to court in order to stop him from him from raping more. Is Cosby THAT intimidating? Does $$$$ talk that loud?

He was that POWERFUL.

Taking him on would have meant taking on all of Hollywood.

This is what we get from people idolizing these idiots.

And by idiots, I mean..even the ones that don't rape women.

And it seems a whole lot of people are still idolizing him.

GFB wrote:

crocmommy wrote:I hope this is not misunderstood....but I just can't understand how not even one of the victims weren't willing to take him to court in order to stop him from him from raping more. Is Cosby THAT intimidating? Does $$$$ talk that loud?

He was that POWERFUL.

I though Michael Jackson was too. Didn't stop someone from at least taking him to court.

I wish people could just learn to..go to the movies..be entertained for a couple of hours..and that be the end of it.

Not to be.

crocmommy wrote:

GFB wrote:

crocmommy wrote:I hope this is not misunderstood....but I just can't understand how not even one of the victims weren't willing to take him to court in order to stop him from him from raping more. Is Cosby THAT intimidating? Does $$$$ talk that loud?

He was that POWERFUL.

I though Michael Jackson was too. Didn't stop someone from at least taking him to court.

No, he wasn't.

When he WAS powerful, he successfully paid off and shut up the accusers..and the music business shut their eyes and ears.

When his career waned, he was vulnerable..like Cosby is now.

OK Greg....you would know. That makes sense I guess. I'm just tired of famous people not going to jail for stuff like this. Same thing with the Catholic priests molesting boys.

crocmommy wrote:OK Greg....you would know. That makes sense I guess. I'm just tired of famous people not going to jail for stuff like this. Same thing with the Catholic priests molesting boys.

You and me are both are tired of all that.

It also seems the music industry does not move as one living leviathan like the TV and movie industry.

GFB wrote:

crocmommy wrote:OK Greg....you would know. That makes sense I guess. I'm just tired of famous people not going to jail for stuff like this. Same thing with the Catholic priests molesting boys.

You and me are both are tired of all that.

It also seems the music industry does not move as one living leviathan like the TV and movie industry.

Speaking of perverts and the music industry, what ever happened to Gary Glitter? Wasn't he the one in trouble for child molestation overseas?

crocmommy wrote:

GFB wrote:

crocmommy wrote:OK Greg....you would know. That makes sense I guess. I'm just tired of famous people not going to jail for stuff like this. Same thing with the Catholic priests molesting boys.

You and me are both are tired of all that.

It also seems the music industry does not move as one living leviathan like the TV and movie industry.

Speaking of perverts and the music industry, what ever happened to Gary Glitter? Wasn't he the one in trouble for child molestation overseas?

The name sounded vaguely familiar, but I had to look him up.

Sounds like he got himself in a heap of trouble.

Checked it out on Wikipedia. How did Glitter ever get released? He should have been locked up for a long time. Now he's back in trouble for more and hope he ends up locked up for life.

My default setting is to consider most famous people deeply flawed individuals.

Red Oak wrote:My default setting is to consider most famous people deeply flawed individuals.

Not a bad setting.

crocmommy wrote:Checked it out on Wikipedia. How did Glitter ever get released? He should have been locked up for a long time. Now he's back in trouble for more and hope he ends up locked up for life.

For an instructive lesson in the way the Looney Left thinks, and why dangerous criminals are released into society at large, it's instructive to be familiar with the case of Jack Henry Abbott. The son of Susan Sarandon and Tim Robbins is his namesake.