Txdigest.com

Prince Andrew sex allegations: 'Slave girl' Virginia Roberts claims she had orgy with duke and EIGHT other girls

She claimed paedophile billionaire Jeffrey Epstein paid her $400 for "servicing" the prince in New York and also says Andrew slept with her and other girls at Caribbean sex party.

Prince Andrew’s “sex slave” vows to bring him to justice in a criminal court alleging he was involved in an underage orgy with his paedophile pal Jeffrey Epstein and eight young girls.

In court papers filed yesterday, Virginia Roberts claims she was paid $400 to “service” Prince Andrew, who she referred to as “Andy”, while under the age of consent.

She repeats her claim of having sex with him in London then gives more details of times she says she met the Duke at Epstein’s home in New York and on his Caribbean island.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/prince-andrew-sex-allegations-slave-5020094

my, oh, my and Bill Clinton on the Billionaires private jet with her ...hmmmmm ...

Rich and powerful people having illicit sex. Does this surprise anyone?

She was paid which means she was hired by consent. She's not a slave... she's just an old-fashioned prostitute who, despite her profession, doesn't have the decency not to talk about her clients.

But Dershowitz too! There's not enough money in the world!

crackertoes wrote:She was paid which means she was hired by consent. She's not a slave... she's just an old-fashioned prostitute who, despite her profession, doesn't have the decency not to talk about her clients.

She was a bit too young for them to be paying her for sex. And it sounds like there were much younger girls than this. They need to lock up Epstein and throw away the key for sure.

millergrovesue wrote:Rich and powerful people having illicit sex. Does this surprise anyone?

Sounds like a bunch of disgusting older men that need to at least stick to women their own age.

The Prince has diplomatic immunity from prosecution for anything he did over here.
Clinton might as well have. Nothing will be done with him.

BillB wrote:The Prince has diplomatic immunity from prosecution for anything he did over here.
Clinton might as well have. Nothing will be done with him.

He did not have diplomatic immunity unless he was admitted with a diplomatic visa which meant he was here on a governmental mission, and according to what I have read he was over here on business as a private citizen.

Now that Prince Andrew has found himself ensnared in the sleazy sex slave story of wealthy degenerate Jeffrey Epstein, Bill Clinton can’t be too far behind.

Epstein, who paid teenage girls for naked massages at his Palm Beach, Florida mansion, is a convicted sex offender whose circle of powerful friends has included financiers, celebrities, politicians, and scientists.

In fact, Epstein, 61, has maintained many of these relationships even after pleading guilty in 2008 to a felony charge stemming from a lengthy probe of his lewd interaction with scores of underage girls, many of whom were recruited while they were students at a Palm Beach high school.

Epstein is pictured above in his most recent sex offender registry photo.

But while Prince Andrew and other public figures resumed meeting with a post-prison Epstein, Clinton appears to have avoided the billionaire, who owns a private Caribbean island, a Manhattan mansion, a New Mexico ranch, and a Paris apartment in addition to his waterfront Palm Beach residence.

According to court records, Clinton “frequently flew” with Epstein aboard the investor’s private jet from 2002 to 2005, the year news of the police investigation of Epstein was first reported.

During the early stages of that probe, cops surreptitiously collected the trash from in front of Epstein’s Palm Beach home. The refuse included documents with the names of some of his many underage masseuses, as well as an Amazon.com invoice for the purchase of sex slave books like “SlaveCraft: Roadmaps for Erotic Servitude--Principles, Skills and Tools,” “Training with Miss Abernathy: A Workbook for Erotic Slaves and Their Owners,” and “SM 101: A Realistic Introduction.”

As part of a civil suit filed against Epstein by several of his victims, lawyers for the women floated the possibility of subpoenaing Clinton since he “might well be a source of relevant information” about Epstein’s activities.

While Clinton was never deposed, lawyers obtained Epstein’s computerized phone directory, which included “e-mail addresses for Clinton along with 21 phone numbers for him, including those for his assistant (Doug Band),” according to a court filing.

that Bill Clinton ... slick Willy will slide away on this one too ..he always does ..

Kiamichi wrote:

BillB wrote:The Prince has diplomatic immunity from prosecution for anything he did over here.
Clinton might as well have. Nothing will be done with him.

He did not have diplomatic immunity unless he was admitted with a diplomatic visa which meant he was here on a governmental mission, and according to what I have read he was over here on business as a private citizen.

Prince Andrew travels around the world as a Trade Envoy for the British government. This gives him diplomatic immunity.
Cameron is busy removing this status from him as a result of this scandal.

scarlett~nc wrote:
While Clinton was never deposed

like that would be worth anything . . .

BillB wrote:

Kiamichi wrote:

BillB wrote:The Prince has diplomatic immunity from prosecution for anything he did over here.
Clinton might as well have. Nothing will be done with him.

He did not have diplomatic immunity unless he was admitted with a diplomatic visa which meant he was here on a governmental mission, and according to what I have read he was over here on business as a private citizen.

Prince Andrew travels around the world as a Trade Envoy for the British government. This gives him diplomatic immunity.
Cameron is busy removing this status from him as a result of this scandal.

10-4. I didn't know he did in fact have diplomatic status. He does not automatically have it as the son of the Queen.

Makes me sick to read this stuff. I just read over a million households in England can't afford to adequately heat their homes in the winter. The Crown is fabulously wealthy. The owned this whole country and still would if we hadn't kicked them out. We should have let the Nazi's have them.

planosteve wrote:Makes me sick to read this stuff. I just read over a million households in England can't afford to adequately heat their homes in the winter. The Crown is fabulously wealthy. The owned this whole country and still would if we hadn't kicked them out. We should have let the Nazi's have them.

not your problem , the British love their Royals ..get over it ...

scarlett~nc wrote:

planosteve wrote:Makes me sick to read this stuff. I just read over a million households in England can't afford to adequately heat their homes in the winter. The Crown is fabulously wealthy. The owned this whole country and still would if we hadn't kicked them out. We should have let the Nazi's have them.

not your problem , the British love their Royals ..get over it ...

The British are brainwashed from birth to love their govt. Just like Americans.

planosteve wrote:Makes me sick to read this stuff. I just read over a million households in England can't afford to adequately heat their homes in the winter. The Crown is fabulously wealthy. The owned this whole country and still would if we hadn't kicked them out. We should have let the Nazi's have them.

The Nazis had them, at one time.
Edward VIII was known as the Nazi King. He was a Hitler sympathizer and a virulent anti-Semite. His girlfriend, Wallis Simpson was probably a Nazi spy.
He was forced to abdicate prior to the War. The pretext was that he couldn't marry Simpson because she was divorced. That wasn't the real reason. The government didn't want a Nazi on the throne.

The only "royals" I ever observed that the British loved were the ones that married into the family. Diane, mostly after she got away from Charles of course, Fergie, and now Kate. The bloodline Royals they seemed to hate.

planosteve wrote:

scarlett~nc wrote:

planosteve wrote:Makes me sick to read this stuff. I just read over a million households in England can't afford to adequately heat their homes in the winter. The Crown is fabulously wealthy. The owned this whole country and still would if we hadn't kicked them out. We should have let the Nazi's have them.

not your problem , the British love their Royals ..get over it ...

The British are brainwashed from birth to love their govt. Just like Americans.

The Royals are not the government.