Page 1 of 1
Name two worse choices
Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2015 6:52 pm
by Sangersteve
Both of these guys are thinking about running for president, I can't think of many with less of a chance.
Who would you choose?
The rino------- Lindsey Graham.
The socialist----- Bernie Sanders.
Re: Name two worse choices
Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2015 7:55 pm
by ralph
I'd probably go with the socialist just to annoy , destroy moderate rinos S.S. . I have revenge in my heart for moderates as I think that they are probably worse than dems !! Graham talks good about the military and foreign policy but he's a squish on immigration same his cousin 'jeff flake' of Arizona and boy friend 'mccain' .
Re: Name two worse choices
Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2015 8:13 pm
by BigTex
I guess I would vote for Hillary in the hope that she would be such a horrible president that any Republican with a pulse could win after four years.
Re: Name two worse choices
Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2015 8:36 pm
by GFB
Can't think of anyone worse than Bernie Sanders, but I can think of a lot worse than Lindsey Graham.
Re: Name two worse choices
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2015 6:18 am
by millergrovesue
BigTex wrote:I guess I would vote for Hillary in the hope that she would be such a horrible president that any Republican with a pulse could win after four years.
Yeah, that worked really well with Obama, didn't it?
Worst president ever for 2 terms.
Re: Name two worse choices
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2015 6:43 am
by ann jusko
I guess Lindsey Graham. At least he is concerned about our nation's security. I know Hillary and Obama both ignored that 3 am phone call. We'd be even more broke with Bernie Sanders.
Re: Name two worse choices
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2015 7:21 am
by BigTex
millergrovesue wrote:BigTex wrote:I guess I would vote for Hillary in the hope that she would be such a horrible president that any Republican with a pulse could win after four years.
Yeah, that worked really well with Obama, didn't it?
Worst president ever for 2 terms.
Can't disagree with you. It would be a gamble that might pay off, might blow up. While Hillary would be celebrated as the first female president, I don't think she would enjoy the same force field that surrounds BHO.
Re: Name two worse choices
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2015 10:57 am
by Sangersteve
Found one.
Despite repeated claims to the contrary, Mayor Bill de Blasio is positioning himself to be the leftist “progressive” alternative to Wall Street-friendly Hillary Rodham Clinton as the Democratic candidate for president, a national party operative told The Post.
De Blasio’s hope, the operative said, is a “Draft de Blasio’’ movement will develop among progressive activists over the next several months that will lead to the mayor being able to defeat Clinton in the primary elections next year in much the same way leftist Sen. George McGovern successfully challenged the initially front-running establishment Democratic candidate, Sen. Edmund Muskie, more than 40 years ago.
Re: Name two worse choices
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2015 11:23 am
by ralph
de blasio would be interesting ehh , lots of budding young American socialists are going to be pretty excited I think .
Re: Name two worse choices
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2015 11:39 am
by Ric
ralph wrote: I have revenge in my heart for moderates as I think that they are probably worse than dems !! ' .
Pfft!
Re: Name two worse choices
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2015 11:54 am
by ralph
that'd be a de blasio and sanders team Ric !!