It's a girl
Posted: Sat May 02, 2015 9:47 am
Page 1 of 1
Re: It's a girl
Posted: Sat May 02, 2015 11:20 am
Good for them.
Re: It's a girl
Posted: Mon May 04, 2015 10:02 am
That was a VERY fast labor and delivery!
Re: It's a girl
Posted: Mon May 04, 2015 1:33 pm
she has a name ..Princess Charlotte Elizabeth Diana ...
Re: It's a girl
Posted: Mon May 04, 2015 2:11 pm
Not as cute as my grandbaby.
Re: It's a girl
Posted: Mon May 04, 2015 3:38 pm
jellowrestling wrote:Not as cute as my grandbaby.
Maybe not but I'll bet she has more names than your grandbaby.
Don't know why the royals can't be satisfied with just a couple of names.Re: It's a girl
Posted: Mon May 04, 2015 3:43 pm
The males have five or six given names.
Re: It's a girl
Posted: Mon May 04, 2015 4:09 pm
I thought they might name her Camilla... 
Re: It's a girl
Posted: Mon May 04, 2015 4:23 pm
At least there are no apostrophes.
Re: It's a girl
Posted: Mon May 04, 2015 4:54 pm
crocmommy wrote:I thought they might name her Camilla...
Had they been good Texans they would have named her something like Sissy Rose.
Re: It's a girl
Posted: Mon May 04, 2015 6:57 pm
crocmommy wrote:I thought they might name her Camilla...
Now that is the funniest thing I have read today.
Re: It's a girl
Posted: Tue May 05, 2015 9:44 am
grouchy wrote:crocmommy wrote:I thought they might name her Camilla...
Now that is the funniest thing I have read today.
Snarky r me!!
Re: It's a girl
Posted: Tue May 05, 2015 9:53 am
Tow of the great British mysteries:
John & Yoko
Charles & Camilla
John & Yoko
Charles & Camilla
Re: It's a girl
Posted: Tue May 05, 2015 11:26 am
Red Oak wrote:Tow of the great British mysteries:
John & Yoko
Charles & Camilla
John and Yoko I don't get. Had to be more there than met the eye.........and drugs were involved.
Charles and Camilla I understand completely. Theirs is a true love story and a story of how family/country expectations and requirements can screw up a person's life. I'm glad he finally had the gumption to buck the system and marry the woman he had loved for years.
Re: It's a girl
Posted: Tue May 05, 2015 11:49 am
I think I understand John and Yoko. Although John took full advantage of the fame and fortune, at his core he was an artist and did not like the constraints of being a Beatle and or living up to the expectations of Beatles fans. Yoko was a complete departure from the Beatle mold. Avant garde artist, not western/European, not one of the beautiful people. She was the poke in the eye of all the teeny-boppers who just wanted John to be one of those loveable moptops. John was probably more in love with what she represented as a positioning statement than who she was a person.
Re: It's a girl
Posted: Tue May 05, 2015 12:28 pm
BigTex wrote:I think I understand John and Yoko. Although John took full advantage of the fame and fortune, at his core he was an artist and did not like the constraints of being a Beatle and or living up to the expectations of Beatles fans. Yoko was a complete departure from the Beatle mold. Avant garde artist, not western/European, not one of the beautiful people. She was the poke in the eye of all the teeny-boppers who just wanted John to be one of those loveable moptops. John was probably more in love with what she represented as a positioning statement than who she was a person.
That makes sense. Staying in bed for days on end, a la' Elvis, on the other hand...........................
Re: It's a girl
Posted: Tue May 05, 2015 12:42 pm
Edward VIII gave up the throne to marry Wallis Simpson in 1938 (I think).
It's almost forgotten about, but it was a huge story when it happened.
It's almost forgotten about, but it was a huge story when it happened.