Txdigest.com

As previously reporter by BenSwann.com’s Derrick Broze, former Florida Senator Bob Graham claims that Saudi Arabia funded the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, and in an interview with the New York Times, Graham won’t stop until the truth is out.

“Number one, I think the American people deserve to know the truth of what has happened in their name. Number 2 is justice for these family members who have suffered such loss and thus far have been frustrated largely by the U.S. government in their efforts to get some compensation,” said the former head of the Senate Intelligence Committee to the Times.

Graham said that a smoking gun in this case are contained in 80,000 documents being reviewed by a federal judge in south Florida. The documents are being reviewed by the judge thanks to the work of FloridaBulldog.org’s investigative journalist, Dan Christensen, who submitted a FOIA request to obtain those documents. These documents, which are being released little by little, show a connection between a wealthy Florida family, the Saudi royal family and the hijackers.

Graham, who was the former head of the intelligence Senate committee and had first hand knowledge of these documents, says that the FBI is covering up the fact that it investigated this family. Judge Andrew Napolitano told Fox News’ Shepard Smith that he believes that Graham has seen the documents and knows exactly what’s in them (3:34).

Smith said that the family just vanished, leaving a fridge full of food and all of their belongs just prior to the terrorist attacks.

“To me, the most simple, unanswered question of 9/11 is, did the 19 hijackers act alone or were they assisted by someone in the United States?” he said to the Times. “The official position of the United States government is they acted alone. My motivation is to try to answer that question. Did they act alone or did they have a support structure that made 9/11 possible?”

Smith noted that if the government of Saudi Arabia, not people, but the government, aided and financed the terrorists of 9/11, then it was an act of war. “If what Senator Graham is alleging is true, that’s an act of war … they killed over 3,000 of our people,” Smith said.
http://truthinmedia.com/sen-bob-graham-says-fbi-went-beyond-911-cover-up-to-aggressive-deception/

I said at the old place many years ago that a city in Saudi Arabia should have been leveled a day after informing the House of Saud of the time/location.

Our gov instead decided to play blood feud with an individual/group in Afghanistan then went really stupid invading Iraq with no clear plan other than oust Saddam, spend lives , spend money , and hope for the best.

You have previously posted (several times) that the WTC was brought down by demolition charges, not by the planes. So which is it?

jellowrestling wrote:You have previously posted (several times) that the WTC was brought down by demolition charges, not by the planes. So which is it?

There is no way an aluminum airliner that can be brought down by a few birds, can cut through steel and fly into a steel skyscraper. Let alone bring it down. Bldg. 7 was brought down with conventional explosives, probably thermite. The towers were brought down by either mini nukes or a directed energy weapon, there is a difference of opinion. Bldg. 6 was destroyed by a nuke in the basement.

So does the Mossad control the Saudi's ? Or the Saudi's control the Mossad ?

All I am certain of is that the Saudis controlled the Bushes.

I'm the sure the President's heart is in it.

GFB wrote:I'm the sure the President's heart is in it.

So, you are saying that George is probably gay?

planosteve wrote:

GFB wrote:I'm the sure the President's heart is in it.

So, you are saying that George is probably gay?

No, my Ipad changed it.should have said.."I'm not sure the President's heart is in it.

planosteve wrote:

jellowrestling wrote:You have previously posted (several times) that the WTC was brought down by demolition charges, not by the planes. So which is it?

There is no way an aluminum airliner that can be brought down by a few birds, can cut through steel and fly into a steel skyscraper. Let alone bring it down. Bldg. 7 was brought down with conventional explosives, probably thermite. The towers were brought down by either mini nukes or a directed energy weapon, there is a difference of opinion. Bldg. 6 was destroyed by a nuke in the basement.

I don't buy it.
The buildings didn't have to be brought down at all.
The fact the hijacked planes flew into the towers was enough to generate a pretext for war, if that's what you think the reason for 911 was.

Allegedly "hijacked planes". Actually, only two of them took off that day. Cell phones don't work above about 2,000 feet. And the one that hit the pentagon would have had the wings and tail sheared off and laying outside the building. And the one in Shanksville would not have hit exactly in an old strip mining pit and disappeared into the ground.
And flying around in a 1 engine prop plane trainer does not mean you can get into the cockpit of a jet airliner and fly it. Ask any pilot.

planosteve wrote:Allegedly "hijacked planes". Actually, only two of them took off that day. Cell phones don't work above about 2,000 feet. And the one that hit the pentagon would have had the wings and tail sheared off and laying outside the building. And the one in Shanksville would not have hit exactly in an old strip mining pit and disappeared into the ground.
And flying around in a 1 engine prop plane trainer does not mean you can get into the cockpit of a jet airliner and fly it. Ask any pilot.

What happened to Barbara Olson, who was on AA flight 77.

GFB wrote:

planosteve wrote:Allegedly "hijacked planes". Actually, only two of them took off that day. Cell phones don't work above about 2,000 feet. And the one that hit the pentagon would have had the wings and tail sheared off and laying outside the building. And the one in Shanksville would not have hit exactly in an old strip mining pit and disappeared into the ground.
And flying around in a 1 engine prop plane trainer does not mean you can get into the cockpit of a jet airliner and fly it. Ask any pilot.

What happened to Barbara Olson, who was on AA flight 77.

She either wasn't on it or she is dead.

planosteve wrote:

GFB wrote:

planosteve wrote:Allegedly "hijacked planes". Actually, only two of them took off that day. Cell phones don't work above about 2,000 feet. And the one that hit the pentagon would have had the wings and tail sheared off and laying outside the building. And the one in Shanksville would not have hit exactly in an old strip mining pit and disappeared into the ground.
And flying around in a 1 engine prop plane trainer does not mean you can get into the cockpit of a jet airliner and fly it. Ask any pilot.

What happened to Barbara Olson, who was on AA flight 77.

She either wasn't on it or she is dead.

She called her husband from the plane just before it hit, giving details of where the plane was, what they were passing, and how low and how fast the plane was going.

Steve, you should give consideration to how disrespectful it is to all the people who died, and also to the hundreds of families that lost loved ones that day..all because of some embarrassingly silly thoughts you can't shake.

GFB wrote:Steve, you should give consideration to how disrespectful it is to all the people who died, and also to the hundreds of families that lost loved ones that day..all because of some embarrassingly silly thoughts you can't shake.

What is disrespectful is accepting the discredited 9/11 govt. report and not insisting on a real investigation to find out what really happened instead of leaving it to the alternate media to figure out the truth. But it will happen. The truth will eventually come out thanks to the people who kept asking questions instead of swallowing the koolaid. That is what real respect for the dead is all about.

planosteve wrote:

GFB wrote:Steve, you should give consideration to how disrespectful it is to all the people who died, and also to the hundreds of families that lost loved ones that day..all because of some embarrassingly silly thoughts you can't shake.

What is disrespectful is accepting the discredited 9/11 govt. report and not insisting on a real investigation to find out what really happened instead of leaving it to the alternate media to figure out the truth. But it will happen. The truth will eventually come out thanks to the people who kept asking questions instead of swallowing the koolaid. That is what real respect for the dead is all about.

Never mind that, you say people that died didn't die..and planes that crashed didn't crash.

...and flight attendants and pilots that died that day didn't crash into the Pentagon or World Trade Center.

..and the many people that were brave enough to stand up to the Muslim hijackers and kept that plane from flying into the White House or Capitol building..weren't even on that plane because the plane never took off.

GFB wrote:

planosteve wrote:

GFB wrote:Steve, you should give consideration to how disrespectful it is to all the people who died, and also to the hundreds of families that lost loved ones that day..all because of some embarrassingly silly thoughts you can't shake.

What is disrespectful is accepting the discredited 9/11 govt. report and not insisting on a real investigation to find out what really happened instead of leaving it to the alternate media to figure out the truth. But it will happen. The truth will eventually come out thanks to the people who kept asking questions instead of swallowing the koolaid. That is what real respect for the dead is all about.

Never mind that, you say people that died didn't die..and planes that crashed didn't crash.

...and flight attendants and pilots that died that day didn't crash into the Pentagon or World Trade Center.

..and the many people that were brave enough to stand up to the Muslim hijackers and kept that plane from flying into the White House or Capitol building..weren't even on that plane because the plane never took off.

Eventually, we will know for certain who died and who didn't. We will know for certain how they died and why. We will know who was responsible and how they did it. And those responsible will be caught, tried, and executed. Otherwise, the people that died on 9/11 will have died for nothing.

I thought everybody knew that the passengers on the 9/11 flights are on Diego Garcia with the passengers from Malaysian Air Flight 370.

planosteve wrote:Eventually, we will know for certain who died and who didn't. We will know for certain how they died and why. We will know who was responsible and how they did it.

Some of us already know.

I agree with Greg. Disrespecting the dead and their loved ones. Not nice.