Txdigest.com

Just saw the cover of shim on Vanity Fair. Gross.

heard of the mag but we don't get it , won't look if I'm in a store .

Wife showed me that photo a while ago.

first thought was a lot of airbrushing was done to make him look like Brooke Shields

I hope he's making a bundle off this.

Now a fullfledged "chick with a d**k."

Revolting.

And to think he once represented America as one of the finest.

Hanging around the Kardashians did this to him.

I can't imagine why anyone would want to get up every morning and have to put on their eyelashes.

Why didn't he pick Jennifer Jenner?

Sangersteve wrote:Why didn't he pick Jennifer Jenner?

This puts him in position to become a Kardashian girl.

Kim, Chloe, Courtney and Caitlyn.

Bertha, Beatrice or Beulah would be better names- closer to Bruce.

I'm going to get sick of hearing about this very soon. And it will be all over the place so not sure how much of it I can avoid.

crocmommy wrote:I'm going to get sick of hearing about this very soon. And it will be all over the place so not sure how much of it I can avoid.

AMEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I wonder why this doesn't bother me at all? Maybe we've been brainwashed. OK, the rest of you are reacting. I guess I just don't see how it could affect me in any way. I'm more incensed about the "spouse" thing in California. I'm a WIFE and proud to be one of 50+ years! I have a husband, that to me is more important than a "spouse" that could be either gender.

I guess it bothers me because he's doing it very publically and probably cashing in on it. And he's going to win a Courage award for doing so. Just go live your life however you want but do I have to hear so much about it?

My wife has one of the morning news shows on the bedroom TV while she gets ready for work. I told her to be prepared for a royal beating this morning.

ann jusko wrote:I wonder why this doesn't bother me at all? Maybe we've been brainwashed. OK, the rest of you are reacting. I guess I just don't see how it could affect me in any way. I'm more incensed about the "spouse" thing in California. I'm a WIFE and proud to be one of 50+ years! I have a husband, that to me is more important than a "spouse" that could be either gender.

One reason it bothers me, just like the gay marriage thing, is that it brings a level of sexuality to pop culture that many of us aren't yet ready to discuss with our children due to their ages. Much (most) of the time the gay\transgender message is built around sex and\or sexual identity, the publicity of these issues is inescapable and forces the discussion before the child is ready to hear of such issue. My kids are 11 & 12 and I don't feel the need to encroach on their childhood innocence with such issues. There will be a day, but not yet.

RaisinCain wrote:

ann jusko wrote:I wonder why this doesn't bother me at all? Maybe we've been brainwashed. OK, the rest of you are reacting. I guess I just don't see how it could affect me in any way. I'm more incensed about the "spouse" thing in California. I'm a WIFE and proud to be one of 50+ years! I have a husband, that to me is more important than a "spouse" that could be either gender.

One reason it bothers me, just like the gay marriage thing, is that it brings a level of sexuality to pop culture that many of us aren't yet ready to discuss with our children due to their ages. Much (most) of the time the gay\transgender message is built around sex and\or sexual identity, the publicity of these issues is inescapable and forces the discussion before the child is ready to hear of such issue. My kids are 11 & 12 and I don't feel the need to encroach on their childhood innocence with such issues. There will be a day, but not yet.

Exactly

Renee Richards, Christine Jorgensen to name a couple. We all seem to have lived through it.