Txdigest.com

"If Hillary didn't send or receive any Top Secret or Confidential e- mails..where exactly did they get sent from?"

GFB wrote:"If Hillary didn't send or receive any Top Secret or Confidential e- mails..where exactly did they get sent from?"

Duh.

We all need to remember that in her first high profile job in politics working with the leader of the Watergate investigation in the early 70's, she was fired! The reason given by the lead investigator was that she was a "habitual liar".

In my mind, that pretty much tells me all I need to know about Ms. Clinton.

If the unborn are not human, why are their parts harvested for use in humans ?

Well .... lets get you a new mind.

Jay Weaver wrote:We all need to remember that in her first high profile job in politics working with the leader of the Watergate investigation in the early 70's, she was fired! The reason given by the lead investigator was that she was a "habitual liar".

In my mind, that pretty much tells me all I need to know about Ms. Clinton.

A pair of articles published during Hillary Clinton's run for the presidency in 2008, one by Northstar Writers Group founder Dan Calabrese and one by Jerry Zeifman himself, asserted that Zeifman was Hillary's supervisor during the Watergate investigation and that he eventually fired her from the investigation for "unethical, dishonest" conduct. However, whatever Zeifman may have thought of Hillary and her work during the investigation, he was not her supervisor, neither he nor anyone else fired her from her position on the Impeachment Inquiry staff (Zeifman in fact didn't have the power to fire her, even had he wanted to do so), his description of her conduct as "unethical" and "dishonest" is his personal, highly subjective characterization, and the "facts" on which he bases that characterization are ones that he has contradicted himself about on multiple occasions.
Read more at http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons ... PjE8XVy.99

jellowrestling wrote:

GFB wrote:"If Hillary didn't send or receive any Top Secret or Confidential e- mails..where exactly did they get sent from?"

Duh.

If you think about it, it should be the first question any credible journalist would ask.

Jay Weaver wrote:We all need to remember that in her first high profile job in politics working with the leader of the Watergate investigation in the early 70's, she was fired! The reason given by the lead investigator was that she was a "habitual liar".

In my mind, that pretty much tells me all I need to know about Ms. Clinton.

She hasn't changed one bit in 40 years.

What is amusing (in a not funny way)--the Chinese or Russians (no one seems to know for sure) hacked into our government's servers....maybe her info was actually more secure over at her house.

Now, before you start jumping me, I am not in her camp, nor do I think what she did was wise--I just think it sounds like a cartoon skit that hers wasn't hacked (that we know of) and the government was.

How do you know hers wasn't hacked?

Of course it got hacked.

The Chinese and Russians have everything that ever went through that server.

There's just a way to know when the government server gets hacked.

This was a Jerry rigged Mickey Mouse operation in her bathroom.