Leading from behind
Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2014 5:35 pm
.
Page 1 of 1
Re: Leading from behind
Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2014 5:42 pm
I think you have to disregard Carter because of the high no opinion. Probably because a lot of people don't remember the Carter administration. They weren't born or just kids then.
Re: Leading from behind
Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2014 5:42 pm
Carter's high No Opinion rate probably has to with the fact many ask were not born when he was in office.
My favorable Opinion of Clinton is a lot higher than my opinion of Obama.
My favorable Opinion of Clinton is a lot higher than my opinion of Obama.
Re: Leading from behind
Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2014 5:49 pm
planosteve wrote:I think you have to disregard Carter because of the high no opinion. Probably because a lot of people don't remember the Carter administration. They weren't born or just kids then.
Even if you give all of Carters no opinion to the unfavorable category he still has better ratings than the current king.
Re: Leading from behind
Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2014 5:58 pm
I expect sending military to Iraq will hurt him more with Dem than Pubs. So, his approval could drop quite a bit more if he keeps it up. Right now he's just "showing the flag"
Re: Leading from behind
Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2014 6:08 pm
Obama could boost his popularity by personally leading a division into Iraq.
He would be at the head of it.
It isn't unprecedented. President Washington lead the militia during the Whiskey Rebellion.
He would be at the head of it.
It isn't unprecedented. President Washington lead the militia during the Whiskey Rebellion.
Re: Leading from behind
Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2014 6:11 pm
47 % of those Polled are dumb SOBs 