USS Fort Worth disabled

Description of your first forum.
Red Oak
Posts: 6231
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 7:00 pm

USS Fort Worth disabled

Postby Red Oak » Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:24 pm

The USS Fort Worth, a Navy littoral combat ship, has suffered extensive gear damage while docked at a port in Singapore. The Navy is blaming the incident on a crew error.

According to reports, the crew failed to use sufficient lube oil, leading to excessively high temperatures on the gears. Debris also found its way into the lubrication system, which also contributed to failure, Defense News reports. The crew did not follow standard operating procedures.

Immediately following the incident, ship repair experts arrived on the scene to assess the damage. Until the investigation wraps up, the ship will remain at the Changi Naval Base in Singapore.

"We have the right resources in place to conduct the necessary inspections, determine the extent of the damage and required repairs, and return Fort Worth back to operational status," Lt. Cmdr. Matt Knight, a spokesman for the US Pacific Fleet, told Defense News. "USS Fort Worth has been a model of reliability for more than one year while deployed in the US 7th Fleet. We are working diligently to minimize the operational impact of this maintenance casualty."

This marks the second incident over the last couple months that an LCS ship has been brought down due to mechanical failure. The Milwaukee broke down approximately 40 miles off the coast of Virginia. The Navy had to collect the ship and tow it back to Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek-Fort Story.

Navy officials told Defense News that the problem with the USS Fort Worth and the USS Milwaukee is somewhat similar, though the actual causes are distinct. It is unknown when the problems with Fort Worth will clear up. A few weeks ago, Defense Secretary Ash Carter told Navy Secretary Ray Mabus that orders of LCS ships were to be capped at 40, rather than the original amount of 52. The Navy disputed the decision at the time and still hopes Carter will have a change of heart.

Fort Worth has been deployed to Asia since November 2014.
Image

I am a never Hillaryite!

User avatar
GFB
Posts: 30604
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 6:59 pm
Location: Native American

Re: USS Fort Worth disabled

Postby GFB » Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:41 pm

Too bad about the ship, but Singapore is an exceptionally good choice for a bunch of sailors to get stranded.
If you’re “woke”..you’re a loser.

ralph
Posts: 19017
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2014 2:21 pm

Re: USS Fort Worth disabled

Postby ralph » Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:44 pm

maybe the crew got things mixed up and was using the cinnamon flavored lube oil hat some in the crew favors rather than the proper lube oil for gears !! [who knows] ??

User avatar
BigTex
Posts: 6060
Joined: Mon May 26, 2014 5:23 pm

Re: USS Fort Worth disabled

Postby BigTex » Sat Jan 23, 2016 9:19 pm

Sabotage of the shaft reduction gears used to occur ever now and then, particularly when the ship was visiting an exotic port or was nearing its departure date for overseas deployment. The Navy instituted measures to prevent that from happening. I had not heard of a case in years.

This is probably a maintenance issue or a mechanical flaw, but I wouldn't rule out sabotage.

ralph
Posts: 19017
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2014 2:21 pm

Re: USS Fort Worth disabled

Postby ralph » Sat Jan 23, 2016 9:28 pm

SABOTAGE , who would do the Sabotage BT ??

User avatar
BigTex
Posts: 6060
Joined: Mon May 26, 2014 5:23 pm

Re: USS Fort Worth disabled

Postby BigTex » Sat Jan 23, 2016 9:52 pm

A sailor who doesn't want to leave Singapore.

ralph
Posts: 19017
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2014 2:21 pm

Re: USS Fort Worth disabled

Postby ralph » Sat Jan 23, 2016 10:06 pm

quite the crew that the navy is letting into the ranks eh BT ?? Probably lots of money in damage to the ship and the enlisted guy that did the sabotage is not good for the Navies mission ?? Wonder what he or she Enlistee might do next .

ralph
Posts: 19017
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2014 2:21 pm

Re: USS Fort Worth disabled

Postby ralph » Sat Jan 23, 2016 10:12 pm

I mean , what did this ship cost and it might be sabotaged by an enlistee or other type sailor because they want to stay in Singapore . Sounds messed up to me !! Guilty guy or girl if found should be heavily disciplined and drummed out of the navy to go to work on a Louisiana shrimp boat , imo !!

ralph
Posts: 19017
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2014 2:21 pm

Re: USS Fort Worth disabled

Postby ralph » Sat Jan 23, 2016 10:46 pm

and what kinda person is the 'usa' navy accepting into its ranks that Might sabotage a critical piece of navy equipment so that they can stay in Singapore BT ??

User avatar
GFB
Posts: 30604
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 6:59 pm
Location: Native American

Re: USS Fort Worth disabled

Postby GFB » Sat Jan 23, 2016 11:12 pm

..someone that's been there before.
If you’re “woke”..you’re a loser.

Cowman52

Re: USS Fort Worth disabled

Postby Cowman52 » Sat Jan 23, 2016 11:14 pm

If you ain't smart enough to know you gotta check the oil, you need to be peeling tatters.

User avatar
Ric
Posts: 347
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 6:41 pm
Location: The 76028

Re: USS Fort Worth disabled

Postby Ric » Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:14 am

Cowman52 wrote:If you ain't smart enough to know you gotta check the oil, you need to be peeling tatters.


What's a 'tatter'? :D
If a woman has to choose between catching a fly ball and saving an infant's life, she will choose to save the infant's life without even considering if there is a man on base. — George Bernard Shaw .

User avatar
GFB
Posts: 30604
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 6:59 pm
Location: Native American

Re: USS Fort Worth disabled

Postby GFB » Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:37 am

Ric wrote:
Cowman52 wrote:If you ain't smart enough to know you gotta check the oil, you need to be peeling tatters.


What's a 'tatter'? :D


Nothin'..what's a tatter with you?
If you’re “woke”..you’re a loser.


Return to “Your first forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests