Page 1 of 1

Supreme Court rebuffs 9/11 victims

Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2014 9:39 pm
by Bob Of Burleson

Supreme Court turns away 9/11 suit
against alleged Al Qaeda supporters


Lawyers for 9/11 victims sought to pursue what they said were the ‘principal financial
and operational supporters of al Qaeda.’ But lower courts dismissed much of their
lawsuit, and the US Supreme Court declined to get involved.


By Warren Richey
The Christian Science Monitor

Thousands of victims of the 9/11 terror attacks have lost their bid to revive a class-action lawsuit against various banks, financial officials, and members of Osama bin Laden’s family for allegedly providing material support to Al Qaeda.

The US Supreme Court on Monday declined to take up a case examining whether lower courts properly dismissed a significant portion of their lawsuit.

The high court took the action without comment.

The justices had asked the Obama administration for its views on the case. US Solicitor General Donald Verrilli said in a filing last month that the court should reject the case.

Lawyers for those killed or injured or who suffered property damage in the hijack-terror operation sought to pursue what they said were the “principal financial and operational supporters of al Qaeda” during the period leading up to the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

They included several Saudi banks, Islamic charities, three financial institutions in Liechtenstein, four of Mr. bin Laden’s half brothers, and the family construction business, the Saudi Binladin Group.

MORE

Re: Supreme Court rebuffs 9/11 victims

Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 5:10 am
by planosteve
They were trying to sue the wrong people.

Re: Supreme Court rebuffs 9/11 victims

Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 10:58 am
by jellowrestling
planosteve wrote:They were trying to sue the wrong people.

Bilderbergs? Trilateral Commission? The "real bombers"?

Re: Supreme Court rebuffs 9/11 victims

Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 11:12 am
by planosteve
George and his brother Bandar.

Re: Supreme Court rebuffs 9/11 victims

Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 11:59 am
by bodine
Is this about the victims of 9/11; or their money grubbing lawyers trolling for big payouts?

Re: Supreme Court rebuffs 9/11 victims

Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 12:00 pm
by GFB
jellowrestling wrote:
planosteve wrote:They were trying to sue the wrong people.

Bilderbergs? Trilateral Commission? The "real bombers"?


Smurfs

Re: Supreme Court rebuffs 9/11 victims

Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 2:50 pm
by planosteve
By the way George's brother is actually Bandar bin Sultan, a Saudi prince. If you are wondering what he's up to these days, he's been been at work creating ISIS.

Re: Supreme Court rebuffs 9/11 victims

Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 4:38 pm
by GFB
On drugs today?