Mr. Mueller has some questions to ask Mr. Trump
- planosteve
- Posts: 22816
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 8:04 pm
Mr. Mueller has some questions to ask Mr. Trump
Actually, 48 to be exact.
"Nice little Jewish community you got here"-Arab world to Nut Job
Re: Mr. Mueller has some questions to ask Mr. Trump
I doubt he will ever get to utter one, much less 48.
If a woman has to choose between catching a fly ball and saving an infant's life, she will choose to save the infant's life without even considering if there is a man on base. — George Bernard Shaw .
Re: Mr. Mueller has some questions to ask Mr. Trump
Ric wrote:I doubt he will ever get to utter one, much less 48.
If Mueller doesn't get his chance; ddt will probably regret it. The truth
tends to come out and ddt will pay. (He should.)
Still seems to me (and it will to others) the most obvious thing in the room
is the President is fighting tooth and nail to keep Mueller from doing his
job.
Will anyone tell me (and the rest of us) why?
Without dragging in the sins of others, which really aren't the point right
now, why is ddt not telling the American People the truth?
All Life is Feudal
Re: Mr. Mueller has some questions to ask Mr. Trump
mayhem wrote:Ric wrote:I doubt he will ever get to utter one, much less 48.
If Mueller doesn't get his chance; ddt will probably regret it. The truth
tends to come out and ddt will pay. (He should.)
Still seems to me (and it will to others) the most obvious thing in the room
is the President is fighting tooth and nail to keep Mueller from doing his
job.
Will anyone tell me (and the rest of us) why?
Without dragging in the sins of others, which really aren't the point right
now, why is ddt not telling the American People the truth?
These type of “Independent” Counsels have thoroughly unchecked power..never do they come back and say.”nope..couldn’t find a thing.”
There was no Collusion with Russians..which is what this was supposed to be about..so the “Counsel” becomes a Prosecutor that has to create “process crimes”..like what happened to Martha Stewart, and also to General Flynn.
In this case, there was zero evidence of Trump and Russians, so they start to investigate a phoney dossier..then a hooker/porn star..and he will continue until he finds a way to trick the President or someone close to him in a perjury trap.
This is unAmerican, Unconstitutional, disgraceful and should have never happened..and never should again, to any President or anyone.
If you’re “woke”..you’re a loser.
Re: Mr. Mueller has some questions to ask Mr. Trump
Actually, there was collusion with the Russians, but it was the Clinton campaign and the DNC doing the colluding.
Classic Alinsky tactic: Accuse your political enemy of doing what you do.
Classic Alinsky tactic: Accuse your political enemy of doing what you do.
The United States Constitution is under attack by the Democrat/Communist party.
Back by popular request:
Indeed, "All Leftists lack critical thinking skills."
Indeed, "All Leftist males are pussies."
Back by popular request:
Indeed, "All Leftists lack critical thinking skills."
Indeed, "All Leftist males are pussies."
Re: Mr. Mueller has some questions to ask Mr. Trump
Well, of course you missed the point.
Why is trumplit not eagerly working WITH leos who
are seeking truth ... however clumsily ... when all
these thingies (you would think) could be put to
bed with much less effort than all this investigation??
The only way that makes sense: trumplit doesn't
want the investigation to do its job.
All your entertaining crap is losing its entertainment
value.
OK.
We'll see.
It's NOT unconstitutional. Why would there be an investigational planbook? And you are
right about ONE thing. It's an OBVIOUS issue ... YOU say "There was no Collusion with Russians..." Good Gawd man! How do we know that? Seems to me that FINDING out is the necessary investigation.
YOU ARE SUCH A HYPOCRITE.
Why is trumplit not eagerly working WITH leos who
are seeking truth ... however clumsily ... when all
these thingies (you would think) could be put to
bed with much less effort than all this investigation??
The only way that makes sense: trumplit doesn't
want the investigation to do its job.
All your entertaining crap is losing its entertainment
value.
OK.
We'll see.
GFB wrote:mayhem wrote:Ric wrote:I doubt he will ever get to utter one, much less 48.
If Mueller doesn't get his chance; ddt will probably regret it. The truth
tends to come out and ddt will pay. (He should.)
Still seems to me (and it will to others) the most obvious thing in the room
is the President is fighting tooth and nail to keep Mueller from doing his
job.
Will anyone tell me (and the rest of us) why?
Without dragging in the sins of others, which really aren't the point right
now, why is ddt not telling the American People the truth?
These type of “Independent” Counsels have thoroughly unchecked power..never do they come back and say.”nope..couldn’t find a thing.”
There was no Collusion with Russians..which is what this was supposed to be about..so the “Counsel” becomes a Prosecutor that has to create “process crimes”..like what happened to Martha Stewart, and also to General Flynn.
In this case, there was zero evidence of Trump and Russians, so they start to investigate a phoney dossier..then a hooker/porn star..and he will continue until he finds a way to trick the President or someone close to him in a perjury trap.
This is unAmerican, Unconstitutional, disgraceful and should have never happened..and never should again, to any President or anyone.
It's NOT unconstitutional. Why would there be an investigational planbook? And you are
right about ONE thing. It's an OBVIOUS issue ... YOU say "There was no Collusion with Russians..." Good Gawd man! How do we know that? Seems to me that FINDING out is the necessary investigation.
YOU ARE SUCH A HYPOCRITE.
All Life is Feudal
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 423 guests