JERRY JONES; PHOTOS "MISREPRESENTED"
- Bob Of Burleson
- Posts: 1803
- Joined: Mon May 26, 2014 10:59 am
JERRY JONES; PHOTOS "MISREPRESENTED"
By David Moore
dmoore@dallasnews.com
OXNARD, Calif. — Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones, for the first time Sunday evening, acknowledged the suggestive photos of him and two women that have been circulating on the Internet in recent days.
Jones called the photos a misrepresentation but offered little else. He used the phrases “I don’t have any more comment’’ and “that’s all I’d really like to get into” a total of six times in a span of three minutes.
The photos that appear to show Jones in suggestive poses with two younger women first appeared on the sports gossip site TerezOwens.com and were picked up Tuesday by Deadspin.com.
The low-quality images were released online in a 20-page manifesto by a man named Frank Hoover, who calls himself the “Son of God.” Hoover writes in the document that the photos are part of a plan by others to extort Jones, although no such scheme has been confirmed.
Asked if the photos were part of an extortion plot, Jones responded:
“Someone has misrepresented photos taken at a restaurant five years ago for their own purposes. I’m just not going to comment on it.’’
MORE
Re: JERRY JONES; PHOTOS "MISREPRESENTED"
Misrepresented seems to be a static in Jerry's life. He has misrepresented the Cowboys as a good football team for at least the last 15 years.
- Addisonrose
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:17 pm
Re: JERRY JONES; PHOTOS "MISREPRESENTED"
tx3653 wrote:Misrepresented seems to be a static in Jerry's life. He has misrepresented the Cowboys as a good football team for at least the last 15 years.
LOL.
Re: JERRY JONES; PHOTOS "MISREPRESENTED"
I'd really like to know how you "misrepresent" a photo of your hands cupping another woman's chi-chis....
Don't think it can be done...
Don't think it can be done...
Re: JERRY JONES; PHOTOS "MISREPRESENTED"
Jerry has often used the incorrect term while explaining something.
It was 5 years ago and, sadly, nothing more than 90% of the owners/GMs past and present do.
It was 5 years ago and, sadly, nothing more than 90% of the owners/GMs past and present do.
Re: JERRY JONES; PHOTOS "MISREPRESENTED"
Lucky he's not in the NBA
They might make him sell the team
They might make him sell the team
Four boxes keep us free:
the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, and the cartridge box.
"You will never accomplish gun control by disarming law-abiding citizens"
Ronald Reagan
the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, and the cartridge box.
"You will never accomplish gun control by disarming law-abiding citizens"
Ronald Reagan
-
- Posts: 8340
- Joined: Mon May 26, 2014 1:16 am
Re: JERRY JONES; PHOTOS "MISREPRESENTED"
bodine wrote:I'd really like to know how you "misrepresent" a photo of your hands cupping another woman's chi-chis....
Don't think it can be done...
I'm not a Jerry Jones defender, but it looks to me like he's hammered, and the woman grabbed his hands and put them on her ta-tas. He's not smiling, and totally looks out of it.
Re: JERRY JONES; PHOTOS "MISREPRESENTED"
There must be something in the water in Arkansas.
- LibraryLady
- Posts: 2255
- Joined: Mon May 26, 2014 9:08 am
Re: JERRY JONES; PHOTOS "MISREPRESENTED"
bodine wrote:I'd really like to know how you "misrepresent" a photo of your hands cupping another woman's chi-chis....
Don't think it can be done...
Not to mention a woman's face in your crotch...........
Native Texan
Maya Angelou said:
“I’ve learned that no matter what happens, or how bad it seems today, life does go on, and it will be better tomorrow.
-
- Posts: 8340
- Joined: Mon May 26, 2014 1:16 am
Re: JERRY JONES; PHOTOS "MISREPRESENTED"
LibraryLady wrote:bodine wrote:I'd really like to know how you "misrepresent" a photo of your hands cupping another woman's chi-chis....
Don't think it can be done...
Not to mention a woman's face in your crotch...........
See my comment above
Re: JERRY JONES; PHOTOS "MISREPRESENTED"
Jerry could have been set up for those pictures, but he wasn't set up for this one.
- Attachments
-
- Screen-shot-2010-11-10-at-4_10_58-PM.png (150.79 KiB) Viewed 1444 times
- planosteve
- Posts: 22973
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 8:04 pm
Re: JERRY JONES; PHOTOS "MISREPRESENTED"
The two women prominently and scandalously featured in the racy photos that surfaced earlier this week of Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones caught in very compromising positions have been identified as strippers.
TMZ Sports has managed to track down the two previously unidentified ladies and both women claim to have a very hazy recollection of the evening in question, saying their memories are quite sullied due to the copious amount of alcohol that was imbibed that night.
The women — identified as Lindzie (the blonde) and Jordan (the brunette) — both currently employed as exotic dancers in Texas, say the events captured in the photographs occurred about five years ago.
But if time hasn’t blurred their ability to recall any details, the booze appears to have done the trick.
TMZ quotes one of the women as stating “there was a lot of alcohol involved.” This eems to add credence to their claim that neither them nor Jones realized the photographs were being snapped by a female friend on the sly. Both reportedly indicated that had Jones noticed, his bodyguard surely would have confiscated whatever photographic device was used.
http://www.sportressofblogitude.com/201 ... e-forward/
TMZ Sports has managed to track down the two previously unidentified ladies and both women claim to have a very hazy recollection of the evening in question, saying their memories are quite sullied due to the copious amount of alcohol that was imbibed that night.
The women — identified as Lindzie (the blonde) and Jordan (the brunette) — both currently employed as exotic dancers in Texas, say the events captured in the photographs occurred about five years ago.
But if time hasn’t blurred their ability to recall any details, the booze appears to have done the trick.
TMZ quotes one of the women as stating “there was a lot of alcohol involved.” This eems to add credence to their claim that neither them nor Jones realized the photographs were being snapped by a female friend on the sly. Both reportedly indicated that had Jones noticed, his bodyguard surely would have confiscated whatever photographic device was used.
http://www.sportressofblogitude.com/201 ... e-forward/
There is no bad peace and there are no good wars
- LibraryLady
- Posts: 2255
- Joined: Mon May 26, 2014 9:08 am
Re: JERRY JONES; PHOTOS "MISREPRESENTED"
Both reportedly indicated that had Jones noticed, his bodyguard surely would have confiscated whatever photographic device was used.
Silly me, I thought the job of the bodyguard WAS to notice such things and "handle them"
have been identified as strippers.
Who saw that coming? BAWAaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Native Texan
Maya Angelou said:
“I’ve learned that no matter what happens, or how bad it seems today, life does go on, and it will be better tomorrow.
Re: JERRY JONES; PHOTOS "MISREPRESENTED"
who cares
Re: JERRY JONES; PHOTOS "MISREPRESENTED"
kent wrote:who cares
.
Highly anticipated
.
Tea + Water = Tea
Tea + Water + Sweetener = Sweet Tea
Any other designation is redUNdant
Tea + Water + Sweetener = Sweet Tea
Any other designation is redUNdant
Re: JERRY JONES; PHOTOS "MISREPRESENTED"
I'm more shocked it took THIS long for something like this to surface. And his sons aren't perfect either...
-
- Posts: 8340
- Joined: Mon May 26, 2014 1:16 am
Re: JERRY JONES; PHOTOS "MISREPRESENTED"
ABout five or six years ago, I was playing at The Mule. We were rocking some song when I suddenly realized that some woman had come up behind me and was rubbing up against my back.
During the break, she was talking to one of the other band members, and said, "The bass player looks familiar. What's his name?" He told her my name and what I do, and she said, "Oh my God, I was just flirting with my son's high school counselor!". Her husband, who was there and saw the whole thing, almost fell out of his chair laughing.
Long story short: what she was doing wasn't that big of a deal; she was just having some fun, and she wasn't really violating my personal space in any meaningful way. If someone had taken a picture, it might have appeared to me much different (and worse) than it really was.
During the break, she was talking to one of the other band members, and said, "The bass player looks familiar. What's his name?" He told her my name and what I do, and she said, "Oh my God, I was just flirting with my son's high school counselor!". Her husband, who was there and saw the whole thing, almost fell out of his chair laughing.
Long story short: what she was doing wasn't that big of a deal; she was just having some fun, and she wasn't really violating my personal space in any meaningful way. If someone had taken a picture, it might have appeared to me much different (and worse) than it really was.
Re: JERRY JONES; PHOTOS "MISREPRESENTED"
I'm sure Jones was an innocent bystander and there was nothing wrong with any of it.
He was probably just auditioning cheerleaders.
He was probably just auditioning cheerleaders.
Re: JERRY JONES; PHOTOS "MISREPRESENTED"
jellowrestling wrote:ABout five or six years ago, I was playing at The Mule. We were rocking some song when I suddenly realized that some woman had come up behind me and was rubbing up against my back.
During the break, she was talking to one of the other band members, and said, "The bass player looks familiar. What's his name?" He told her my name and what I do, and she said, "Oh my God, I was just flirting with my son's high school counselor!". Her husband, who was there and saw the whole thing, almost fell out of his chair laughing.
Long story short: what she was doing wasn't that big of a deal; she was just having some fun, and she wasn't really violating my personal space in any meaningful way. If someone had taken a picture, it might have appeared to me much different (and worse) than it really was.
She was flirting with you right in front of her husband. Hmmmmmmmmm
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 253 guests