A brand new motion picture on 9/11 featuring what happened to building 7. So, pop you some popcorn, sit back, and enjoy!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aw2Wiyv4Bms
For Your Viewing Pleasure
- planosteve
- Posts: 22430
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 8:04 pm
For Your Viewing Pleasure
I don't think the end is near anymore. I think it's HERE!
- PlanoSooner
- Posts: 423
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 8:08 pm
- planosteve
- Posts: 22430
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 8:04 pm
Re: For Your Viewing Pleasure
JiP is going to love this. Lots of thermite action.
I don't think the end is near anymore. I think it's HERE!
- John in Plano
- Posts: 3774
- Joined: Mon May 26, 2014 9:02 am
Re: For Your Viewing Pleasure
PlanoSooner wrote:cliff notes?
A fairy tale
It's ok if you disagree with me.
I can't force you to be right.
I can't force you to be right.
- planosteve
- Posts: 22430
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 8:04 pm
Re: For Your Viewing Pleasure
Too late for this one.
I don't think the end is near anymore. I think it's HERE!
Re: For Your Viewing Pleasure
If the purpose of the Attacks was to motivate the US to invade Afghanistan & Iraq wouldn't the Bushes have told the Mossad to hire a few Pashtuns & Iraqis as fake High Jackers ?
I am a never Hillaryite!
- planosteve
- Posts: 22430
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 8:04 pm
Re: For Your Viewing Pleasure
You might recall that before we invaded Iraq, Bush didn't know a Shiite from a Shinola.Red Oak wrote:If the purpose of the Attacks was to motivate the US to invade Afghanistan & Iraq wouldn't the Bushes have told the Mossad to hire a few Pashtuns & Iraqis as fake High Jackers ?
I don't think the end is near anymore. I think it's HERE!
Re: For Your Viewing Pleasure
I am a never Hillaryite!
Re: For Your Viewing Pleasure
I agree that it was odd that Bush stayed at that school after learning the second building was hit.
It sounds like he had foreknowledge that he wasn't a target.
If the conspiracy folks would stop there and work on that angle, they might hit pay dirt.
They keep going and get too nutty to hold my interest.
It sounds like he had foreknowledge that he wasn't a target.
If the conspiracy folks would stop there and work on that angle, they might hit pay dirt.
They keep going and get too nutty to hold my interest.
- planosteve
- Posts: 22430
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 8:04 pm
Re: For Your Viewing Pleasure
BillB wrote:I agree that it was odd that Bush stayed at that school after learning the second building was hit.
It sounds like he had foreknowledge that he wasn't a target.
If the conspiracy folks would stop there and work on that angle, they might hit pay dirt.
They keep going and get too nutty to hold my interest.
Most of the time is spent analyzing bldg. 7. I'm not sure what is nutty about claiming it was a controlled demolition. The evidence is overwhelming. And if so, the whole official version of what happened to the WTC on 9/11 unravels.
I don't think the end is near anymore. I think it's HERE!
Re: For Your Viewing Pleasure
planosteve wrote:BillB wrote:I agree that it was odd that Bush stayed at that school after learning the second building was hit.
It sounds like he had foreknowledge that he wasn't a target.
If the conspiracy folks would stop there and work on that angle, they might hit pay dirt.
They keep going and get too nutty to hold my interest.
Most of the time is spent analyzing bldg. 7. I'm not sure what is nutty about claiming it was a controlled demolition. The evidence is overwhelming. And if so, the whole official version of what happened to the WTC on 9/11 unravels.
Demolishing those buildings does not make any sense.
Why was it necessary? It wasn't.
The planes hit the buildings. We know that. That would have been sufficient to cause national outrage. Nothing else was required.
Re: For Your Viewing Pleasure
I'll listen to this theory:
The US government (Bush) had foreknowledge of the 9/11 attacks and let them happen.
There are several things pointing in that direction.
I am not certain of this and certainly will not go any farther than this. There is no need to.
The US government (Bush) had foreknowledge of the 9/11 attacks and let them happen.
There are several things pointing in that direction.
I am not certain of this and certainly will not go any farther than this. There is no need to.
- planosteve
- Posts: 22430
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 8:04 pm
Re: For Your Viewing Pleasure
Demolishing those buildings does not make any sense.
Why was it necessary? It wasn't.
The planes hit the buildings. We know that. That would have been sufficient to cause national outrage. Nothing else was required.
Destroying the towers was necessary to totally destroy all of the evidence. No steel skyscraper has even been more than just damaged when hit by a plane and none has ever collapsed because of fire. To believe that occurred 3 times at the same time in the same place is too much to swallow. The excuse that the burning jet fuel melted all 90 some steel columns in both towers is nuts. Jet fuel doesn't burn nearly hot enough to melt steel and even if it did, bldg. 7 wasn't hit by a plane. That's why it's important and why NIST totally ignored it originally. They had to concoct a separate rube Goldberg explanation for it that makes no sense at all.
I don't think the end is near anymore. I think it's HERE!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Mark and 86 guests