jellowrestling wrote:Oh, please. When O'Reilly said, "in a war zone in Argentina, in the Falklands...", he is obviously saying that he was in Argentina DURING THE FALKLANDS WAR. If he doesn't mention the Falklands, then "Argentina" has no context. If he had said, "I was in the Falklands in a war zone", then he would have been lying.
People who are buying this are either biased, stupid, or easily misled. O'Reilly annoys the hell out of me because he constantly cuts people off instead of letting them finish their thoughts, but this is B.S., pure and simple.
"in a war zone in Argentina, in the Falklands".That is a lie, pure and simple.
1. He was not in a war zone and he was not in the Falklands.
That would be like someone stating "I was in a war zone in the US, at Pearl Harbor", when in fact they were in Dallas.
O'Reilly stated in his book
"I've reported on the ground in active war zones from El Salvador to the Falklands".That is a lie.
He has lied about his experiences in Buenos Aires and El Salvadore, as well.
http://fair.org/blog/2015/02/21/bill-or ... an-others/I won't say people who claim O'Reilly was telling the truth are stupid, or whatever. I will say they speak a different version of English than I do.