In your case, we all just hope for an occasional lerching FROM the land of conspiracies..back to reality.
You need to look up the definition of "conspiracy".
In your case, we all just hope for an occasional lerching FROM the land of conspiracies..back to reality.
planosteve wrote:Jim Stone did a screen caputure of the initial information posted on the UK Telegraph story. It included a statement that witnesses reported hearing a loud bang and then saw jet fighters. Then shortly after, that information was scrubbed from the website.
I noted that on the CBS TV report tonight they made it a point to interview someone in the area who stated that they heard nothing. I think that the debris field indicates the plane was destroyed in the air, not when it hit the mountain. Like the airliner shot down by the Ukraine govt. Also, the TV reports this morning first said there was a transmission after the plane started descending. Then they changed their story and said there was no transmission. They had 10 minutes after the plane started down before it crashed. This aircraft is the only airliner that currently has the ability to be flown by remote control.
I think the coverup has begun.
planosteve wrote:In your case, we all just hope for an occasional lerching FROM the land of conspiracies..back to reality.
You need to look up the definition of "conspiracy".
planosteve wrote:In your case, we all just hope for an occasional lerching FROM the land of conspiracies..back to reality.
You need to look up the definition of "conspiracy".
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 37 guests