Another desperate attempt by the idiots on the Left...

[Mark]

They didn't. They believe that he was ineligible under the section 3 of the 14th amendment.
The 14th Amendment bars from office anyone who once took an oath to uphold the Constitution but then “engaged” in “insurrection or rebellion” against it. A growing number of legal scholars say the post-Civil War clause applies to Trump after his role in trying to overturn the 2020 presidential election and encouraging his backers to storm the US Capitol.

How many people have been charged with insurrection under section 2383 of the US code?

According to Websters-Insurrection is an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government. I'd say that Jan 6 meets the definition of insurrection. But, a jury could interpret it either way.
My guess is that this is the reason that Trump was prevented from going to the Capital. To prevent him from being accused of insurrection.

Once again, how many people have been charged with insurrection under section 2383 of the US Code?

[planosteve]

How many people have been charged with insurrection under section 2383 of the US code?

According to Websters-Insurrection is an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government. I'd say that Jan 6 meets the definition of insurrection. But, a jury could interpret it either way.
My guess is that this is the reason that Trump was prevented from going to the Capital. To prevent him from being accused of insurrection.

Once again, how many people have been charged with insurrection under section 2383 of the US Code?

Once again, that's why they kept him from going. I don't think they were interested in charging anybody else.

[Mark]

Dissenting Judge on CO Supreme Court Says Trump Denied Due Process, ‘Like Nothing I’ve Seen in 33 Years’.

Dissenting justices on the Colorado Supreme Court have warned the court’s decision to remove Donald Trump from the state primary ballot for “insurrection” risks sowing “chaos” throughout the country, and that the 45th President did not receive a fair trial.

Despite the fact every top justice in the Centennial State was appointed by a Democratic governor, there was only a 4-3 decision to remove Trump, with Chief Justice Brian Boatright, Justice Maria Berkenkotter, and Justice Carlos Samour dissenting.

“The decision to bar former President Donald J. Trump… by all accounts the current leading Republican presidential candidate (and reportedly the current leading overall presidential candidate) from Colorado’s presidential primary ballot flies in the face of the due process doctrine,” warned Justice Samour.

“There was no fair trial either,” Samour continued, expressing particular concern that Trump had never been deemed guilty of insurrection by a jury of his peers. “I have been involved in the justice system for 33 years now, and what took place here doesn’t resemble anything I’ve seen in a courtroom,” he stressed.

https://thenationalpulse.com/2023/12/20 ... -33-years/

[GFB]

More than once, the dipwad has been asked..how many of the supposed “insurrectionists” have actually been charged with “insurrection.”

It’s kind of a prerequisite.

“That’s why they kept him from going”..is not an answer.

[Mark]

As whacky as some of the Democrat pointed Justices on the USSC are, I'll be very disappointed if this shit doesn't get slapped down in a 9-0 decision.

[GFB]

As whacky as some of the Democrat pointed Justices on the USSC are, I'll be very disappointed if this shit doesn't get slapped down in a 9-0 decision.

I’ll predict 7 to 2.

There’s one retarded one that doesn’t know what a woman is..and the “wise Latina”..who is almost as retarded.

[Mark]

Appointed, appointed, appointed...

(too late to edit)

[Mark]

And here we go....

Three Republican state lawmakers are drafting legislation to remove President Joe Biden from ballots in Georgia, Arizona, and Pennsylvania, Breitbart News exclusively learned Friday.

If Biden is removed from the ballots, the president will have difficulty winning the Democrat primary and presidential election. Georgia, Arizona, and Pennsylvania are vital swing states.

The three state representatives who are drafting the three bills are:

Pennsylvania Rep. Aaron Bernstine (R)
Georgia Rep. Charlice Byrd (R)
Arizona Rep. Cory Mcgarr (R)

The state representatives’ aim is to fight back against the Democrats’ so-called “lawfare” used to attack former President Donald Trump. The Colorado Supreme Court ruled Tuesday in a 4-3 opinion that the United States Constitution’s “Insurrection Clause” blocks Trump from appearing on the state’s presidential ballot.

“We are joining forces to introduce legislation to REMOVE Joe Biden from the ballot in Georgia, Arizona, and Pennsylvania,” the lawmakers told Breitbart News. “The absurdity of radical Democrat judges removing Donald Trump from the ballot in Colorado will be a stain on the American political system for decades. By their very own interpretation of the law, Joe Biden is 100% not eligible to run for political office.”

“Democrats’ insane justification to remove Trump can just as easily be applied to Joe Biden for his ‘insurrection’ at the southern border and his alleged corrupt family business dealings with China,” they continued.

“Colorado radicals just changed the game and we are not going to sit quietly while they destroy our Republic. To be clear, our objective is to showcase the absurdity of Colorado’s decision and allow ALL candidates to be on the ballot in all states,” they wrote. “To do that, we must fight back as Republicans against the communists currently running our great country.”

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023 ... nsylvania/

[jellowrestling]

How can anyone believe that any (serious) court would uphold the principle that judges can tell the members of a political party who they can or can't vote for in their party primaries?

They didn't. They believe that he was ineligible under the section 3 of the 14th amendment.
The 14th Amendment bars from office anyone who once took an oath to uphold the Constitution but then “engaged” in “insurrection or rebellion” against it. A growing number of legal scholars say the post-Civil War clause applies to Trump after his role in trying to overturn the 2020 presidential election and encouraging his backers to storm the US Capitol.

Except he didn't. He told them to peacefully protest.

[planosteve]

How can anyone believe that any (serious) court would uphold the principle that judges can tell the members of a political party who they can or can't vote for in their party primaries?

They didn't. They believe that he was ineligible under the section 3 of the 14th amendment.
The 14th Amendment bars from office anyone who once took an oath to uphold the Constitution but then “engaged” in “insurrection or rebellion” against it. A growing number of legal scholars say the post-Civil War clause applies to Trump after his role in trying to overturn the 2020 presidential election and encouraging his backers to storm the US Capitol.

Except he didn't. He told them to peacefully protest.

Wink Wink.