Can you be objective?

[Sangersteve]

I get told that I am not objective,mostly by people on the left. This happens usually when I present facts that back up my position, and mostly when they have no facts to support their narrative.

BUT, putting that aside, here's my question.

Someone stands accused of something, all of the facts point to that person of actually doing what they were accused of doing. The accused refutes the claim with a defense of mis-identification or being setup, but no hard facts that places them out of range of the accusation.

Do you go with the facts?

What if the accused is a close relative?

[millergrovesue]

I go with real substantiated hard facts. Don't care about initial "facts". Can't say where I would stand without more "facts". I'm a child of the 60s. I trust no one.

[crocmommy]

Yikes....been there done that on a problem with a close relative. It's never a good place.

[grouchy]

Yes