have a significant degree of actual military experience.
Yeah, I read a lot too. So, what your actual military experience.
have a significant degree of actual military experience.
planosteve wrote:Ihave a significant degree of actual military experience.
Yeah, I read a lot too. So, what your actual military experience.
That's it? You don't seem very proud of it. What did you actually do? How long? What did it teach you?A naval career.
planosteve wrote:That's it? You don't seem very proud of it. What did you actually do? How long? What did it teach you?A naval career.
Well, you would be guessing wrong. I was in the DOD 33 years total, active duty and civilian.Castle Doctrine wrote:planosteve wrote:That's it? You don't seem very proud of it. What did you actually do? How long? What did it teach you?A naval career.
Interesting. You have completely escaped talking about the hospital bombing and are now conducting a typical ad hominem attack. I am not interested in playing. Nor, do I feel any need to detail my career. In fact, I decided when RO threatened me that I didn't want to share any more personal info than I could help. You will note that I cleared all profile information. Besides, you are just attempting to bait me now.
Perhaps if you respond to my questions regarding YOUR reasoning and claim to the expertise to make the allegations you have I might be more forth coming. But, I will say that anyone that spent 24 years in the military knows more about this topic than anyone that hasn't served at all. That would be you, I'm guessing.
No prob. I'm kind of a troll myself in a way.Red Oak wrote:Steve-O, Certified Dickhead is a Troll, nothing more.
Red Oak wrote:But you are one of us; our own pet troll
Flattery will get you nowhere.GFB wrote:Red Oak wrote:But you are one of us; our own pet troll
Ditto
Castle Doctrine wrote:What kind of response is that. I offered you my reasoning. You just made an unsupported allegation. All I ask was for you to explain your reasoning. Why would you find that an attempt to intimidate you. I asked if you had some qualification I was unaware of that would give you special insight. I'm going to guess this response is a NO.
As for "showing" you mine...I have been studying military history since I started to read. I was raised by the people that fought and won the Second World War. I pumped them at every opportunity. I have a significant degree of actual military experience. Since leaving active duty I have continued to follow professional military journals and read military history from a variety of sources. Do you need a bibliography?
So, there is mine. Now, you show me yours. And could you explain why you decided to go all "tough guy"? You don't do it very well and there was no call for it. I am totally unintimidated by anyone here. Certainly, no one here has demonstrated the slightest expertise in this area...beyond repeating standard Conservative talking points that they don't understand and can't defend.
So, you have any reasoning to present or are we through here?
John in Plano wrote:steve
When did AC 130s become bombers ?
Read the claim by cd and it made me wonder when it took on that additional duty
bodine wrote:Castle Doctrine wrote:What kind of response is that. I offered you my reasoning. You just made an unsupported allegation. All I ask was for you to explain your reasoning. Why would you find that an attempt to intimidate you. I asked if you had some qualification I was unaware of that would give you special insight. I'm going to guess this response is a NO.
As for "showing" you mine...I have been studying military history since I started to read. I was raised by the people that fought and won the Second World War. I pumped them at every opportunity. I have a significant degree of actual military experience. Since leaving active duty I have continued to follow professional military journals and read military history from a variety of sources. Do you need a bibliography?
So, there is mine. Now, you show me yours. And could you explain why you decided to go all "tough guy"? You don't do it very well and there was no call for it. I am totally unintimidated by anyone here. Certainly, no one here has demonstrated the slightest expertise in this area...beyond repeating standard Conservative talking points that they don't understand and can't defend.
So, you have any reasoning to present or are we through here?
a big plus one....
Red Oak wrote:The some versions of the AC-130 do carry a winged "smart bomb"; perhaps that is the reason for the confused terminology.
And anyone who thinks CD is anything other than a trouble making troll is as crazy as he/she is.
John in Plano wrote:Red Oak wrote:The some versions of the AC-130 do carry a winged "smart bomb"; perhaps that is the reason for the confused terminology.
And anyone who thinks CD is anything other than a trouble making troll is as crazy as he/she is.
Thanks, wonder how that works when they are orbiting on station.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 144 guests