6 Reasons To Question and Investigate 9/11

[planosteve]

But you must explain away all that I posted above, and a lot more, before people will listen to "yeah but building 7 wouldn't have come down".

Otherwise, you set yourself up to be endlessly ridiculed and laughed at...and yes, you"ll simply be a loon.

9/11 was a large and very complex series of events. Your saying that unless every aspect of it can be proven beyond any reasonable doubt, then the official version must be true.
So, you are trying to change the subject from the most obvious and provable aspects to the least. As far as flight 95 that supposedly crashed and disappeared into the ground in Shanksville, the airplane shaped hole where it supposedly crashed was there in a photo taken in 1995.

[John in Plano]

thermite prepostioned days/weeks/months in advance
directed energy weapon at the ready
mini nukes , backpack sized and placed that day or larger and prepostioned in advance
Commercial aircraft replaced with drones
Hole in ground located for cover story
President out of the loop, Cheney is the puppet master


please correct any mistakes

[GFB]

But you must explain away all that I posted above, and a lot more, before people will listen to "yeah but building 7 wouldn't have come down".

Otherwise, you set yourself up to be endlessly ridiculed and laughed at...and yes, you"ll simply be a loon.

9/11 was a large and very complex series of events. Your saying that unless every aspect of it can be proven beyond any reasonable doubt, then the official version must be true.
So, you are trying to change the subject from the most obvious and provable aspects to the least. As far as flight 95 that supposedly crashed and disappeared into the ground in Shanksville, the airplane shaped hole where it supposedly crashed was there in a photo taken in 1995.

You must explain away the KNOWN facts, before you create your own personal scenario.

[planosteve]

If you look on amazon.com you will find a large number of books that treat various aspects of 9/11. As far as I can tell all but one question various aspects of the official version. I can only find one book that supports it. "Debunking 9/11 Myths" by Popular Mechanics. The book itself has been debunked by most reviewers. 37 of 70 reviewers awarded it only 1 star.
http://www.amazon.com/Debunking-11-Myth ... merReviews

[GFB]

..and most of all, you must explain away the ultimate killer of all conspiracies..

..why is there not even ONE person that has come forward that could become the biggest hero in U.S. history by telling us all about it.

Secrets are never kept long, when more than 2 people are involved.

[planosteve]

..and most of all, you must explain away the ultimate killer of all conspiracies..

..why is there not even ONE person that has come forward that could become the biggest hero in U.S. history by telling us all about it.

Secrets are never kept long, when more than 2 people are involved.

No, all I have to do Is show that bldg. 7 was a controlled demolition. The rest of the story falls apart. Or I guess you could argue that building 7 was wired to be demolished without telling anyone who worked in the building which was mostly federal and state govt. agencies.

[BigTex]

Or to put it another way, without the collapse of Building 7 (which only had a 110 story building fall on top of it) you got nothing.

[GFB]

The rest of the story falls apart. Or I guess you could argue that building 7 was wired to be demolished without telling anyone who worked in the building which was mostly federal and state govt. agencies.

We're not talking a "story"..we're talking an event that the whole world watched and lived through.

..and it doesn't all go away because a few people have questions about one of the buildings.

[BigTex]

Do a search of Amazon for books on the existence of Bigfoot.

[planosteve]

The rest of the story falls apart. Or I guess you could argue that building 7 was wired to be demolished without telling anyone who worked in the building which was mostly federal and state govt. agencies.

We're not talking a "story"..we're talking an event that the whole world watched and lived through.

..and it doesn't all go away because a few people have questions about one of the buildings.

2,200 professionals staking their professional reputations is not a "few people".

[BigTex]

How many of those 2200 are currently employed in their profession?

[planosteve]

Or to put it another way, without the collapse of Building 7 (which only had a 110 story building fall on top of it) you got nothing.

Here's the footage of the collapse. Want to point out where it shows a 110 story building on top of it? And why the BBC reported the collapse 20 minutes before it occurred? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bfZkqC50ImA

[BigTex]

OK, I watched it.

So you're saying no debris or fire from the twin towers landed on building 7?

[planosteve]

OK, I watched it.

So you're saying no debris or fire from the twin towers landed on building 7?

No, but two smaller buildings WTC 4 and 6 were closer to the towers and they didn't collapse. But, regardless, if a steel building is damaged by falling debris it doesn't collapse symmetrically straight down at free fall speed.

[BigTex]

Have you ever seen the aftermath of a tornado where one house is left standing in a field of debris?

[planosteve]

Have you ever seen the aftermath of a tornado where one house is left standing in a field of debris?

So, your claiming 9/11 was actually a tornado?

[kent]

I posted this earlier, but it never made it. Oh well, here goes again.

You can't argue this with PS. When you intorduce facts, steve merely calls them a lie and then moves on, back to building 7. he NEVER has addressed the FACT that my coworkers were murdered. He never addresses the FACT that my coworker called in to our control center and informed them her flight had been hijacked and that they were killing the crew. He NEVER addresses the FACT that the person that took that call had to hear the flight attendant scream as her throat was cut - that person hasn't been abe to return to work. He never addresses the fact that a reporter called her husband to let him know they were hijacked and that she was going to die; that they had killed crew. He never addresses the FACT that we had two planes hijacked and crashed, killing all on board. What happened to the people on those flights? What happened to our planes?

I know, I know, it never happened. It's all part of the big coverup.

[BigTex]

Have you ever seen the aftermath of a tornado where one house is left standing in a field of debris?

So, your claiming 9/11 was actually a tornado?

Again, you didn't answer my question.

[BigTex]

For some reason, Steve and 2200 architects don't believe that box cutters are lethal weapons.

[GFB]

The rest of the story falls apart. Or I guess you could argue that building 7 was wired to be demolished without telling anyone who worked in the building which was mostly federal and state govt. agencies.

We're not talking a "story"..we're talking an event that the whole world watched and lived through.

..and it doesn't all go away because a few people have questions about one of the buildings.

2,200 professionals staking their professional reputations is not a "few people".

Yes it is..statistically..and I think you need to go back and read Jello's last post.