Nate Silverman..
Nate Silverman..
..now has the odds of Trump winning.. 60.1%
Harris.. 39.7%
Harris.. 39.7%
If you’re “woke”..you’re a loser.
- planosteve
- Posts: 22973
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 8:04 pm
Re: Nate Silverman..
Nate Silverman-Jewish
Donald Trump-Family mostly Jewish
Donald Trump-Family mostly Jewish
There is no bad peace and there are no good wars
- planosteve
- Posts: 22973
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 8:04 pm
Re: Nate Silverman..
planosteve wrote:Nate Silverman-Jewish
Donald Trump-Family mostly Jewish
His name is "Silver" not Silverman.
There is no bad peace and there are no good wars
Re: Nate Silverman..
planosteve wrote:Nate Silverman-Jewish
Donald Trump-Family mostly Jewish
And this is relevant how?
You are obsessed with Jews, aren't you?
November 5, 2024: The day America got Her second chance.
- planosteve
- Posts: 22973
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 8:04 pm
Re: Nate Silverman..
Mark wrote:planosteve wrote:Nate Silverman-Jewish
Donald Trump-Family mostly Jewish
And this is relevant how?
You are obsessed with Jews, aren't you?
Actually just 1. But, she wasn't Jewish when I married her.
There is no bad peace and there are no good wars
Re: Nate Silverman..
In 2016 he gave Hilary Clinton a 71% chance of winning. At that was the day of the election.
Re: Nate Silverman..
Nate Silver says Harris is leading in the National poll.
This has nothing to do with that.
This is Nate Sulver’s projection of the odds of winning the electoral College in November.
This has nothing to do with that.
This is Nate Sulver’s projection of the odds of winning the electoral College in November.
If you’re “woke”..you’re a loser.
Re: Nate Silverman..
GFB wrote:Nate Silver says Harris is leading in the National poll.
This has nothing to do with that.
This is Nate Sulver’s projection of the odds of winning the electoral College in November.
As I said. The day of the 2016 election he said Clinton had a 71% chance of winning the election. That means he also thought she would win the electoral college. So he was way off.
I'm not saying who will win at this point. I don't know and neither does anybody else. It's all opinion at this point.
Re: Nate Silverman..
Today, Nate Silver has raised Trump’s chances of winning to 62%.
If you’re “woke”..you’re a loser.
- planosteve
- Posts: 22973
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 8:04 pm
Re: Nate Silverman..
GFB wrote:Today, Nate Silver has raised Trump’s chances of winning to 62%.
Which Nate Silver are you talking about? Are there two? Here's the one I see:
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/po ... /national/
There is no bad peace and there are no good wars
Re: Nate Silverman..
planosteve wrote:GFB wrote:Today, Nate Silver has raised Trump’s chances of winning to 62%.
Which Nate Silver are you talking about? Are there two? Here's the one I see:
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/po ... /national/
My comment was not about polling..day to day or otherwise.
Regardless of the recent polls, Nate Silver uses lots of other data to determine who will win in November.
That is what I’m posting here.
If you’re “woke”..you’re a loser.
Re: Nate Silverman..
Pollster Nate Silver predicts Trump poised to win electoral college amid “Mediocre” Harris polling…
https://www.foxnews.com/media/pollster- ... is-polling
https://www.foxnews.com/media/pollster- ... is-polling
If you’re “woke”..you’re a loser.
Re: Nate Silverman..
Silver’s election forecast 9/8/24.
Trump 63.8%
Harris 36%
Trump 63.8%
Harris 36%
If you’re “woke”..you’re a loser.
- planosteve
- Posts: 22973
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 8:04 pm
Re: Nate Silverman..
Here's what Silver actually said : "The forecast is still in toss-up range, but Trump’s chances of winning are his highest since July 30," Silver wrote.
There is no bad peace and there are no good wars
Re: Nate Silverman..
planosteve wrote:Here's what Silver actually said : "The forecast is still in toss-up range, but Trump’s chances of winning are his highest since July 30," Silver wrote.
Oh ok..I guess that gives you leftists a little hope.
If you’re “woke”..you’re a loser.
- planosteve
- Posts: 22973
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 8:04 pm
Re: Nate Silverman..
GFB wrote:planosteve wrote:Here's what Silver actually said : "The forecast is still in toss-up range, but Trump’s chances of winning are his highest since July 30," Silver wrote.
Oh ok..I guess that gives you leftists a little hope.
Speaking of "leftists" This guy doesn't know what the F*** he is!
Trump registered as a Republican in Manhattan in 1987; since that time, he has changed his party affiliation five times. In 1999, he changed his party affiliation to the Independence Party of New York. In August 2001, Trump changed his party affiliation to Democratic. In September 2009, he changed his party affiliation back to the Republican Party. In December 2011, Trump changed to "no party affiliation" (independent). In April 2012, he again returned to the Republican Party.[4]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political ... nald_Trump
There is no bad peace and there are no good wars
Re: Nate Silverman..
planosteve wrote:GFB wrote:planosteve wrote:Here's what Silver actually said : "The forecast is still in toss-up range, but Trump’s chances of winning are his highest since July 30," Silver wrote.
Oh ok..I guess that gives you leftists a little hope.
Speaking of "leftists" This guy doesn't know what the F*** he is!
Trump registered as a Republican in Manhattan in 1987; since that time, he has changed his party affiliation five times. In 1999, he changed his party affiliation to the Independence Party of New York. In August 2001, Trump changed his party affiliation to Democratic. In September 2009, he changed his party affiliation back to the Republican Party. In December 2011, Trump changed to "no party affiliation" (independent). In April 2012, he again returned to the Republican Party.[4]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political ... nald_Trump
Hey Dipwad..nobody cares. He’s been President already.
He was a truly great one.
(..just not for you wacko leftists.)
If you’re “woke”..you’re a loser.
Re: Nate Silverman..
GfB, you seem to think “leftist” is an insult.
If a leftist is someone who is progressive rather than regressive, someone who believes the middle and lower middle class should be able to provide for their families without working 2 or 3 jobs, someone who believes that corporations will take every handout we give them without reciprocation, someone who wants every man, woman, and child in this country to have access to proper health care without having to file bankruptcy, someone who believes that the church shouldn’t be involved in politics while they operate tax-free. Then you’re damn right I’m a leftist and damn proud of it.
The big question is why anyone who participates in this board think they have enough income/assets to be effected by any “leftist” policies. You’re not that guy.
If a leftist is someone who is progressive rather than regressive, someone who believes the middle and lower middle class should be able to provide for their families without working 2 or 3 jobs, someone who believes that corporations will take every handout we give them without reciprocation, someone who wants every man, woman, and child in this country to have access to proper health care without having to file bankruptcy, someone who believes that the church shouldn’t be involved in politics while they operate tax-free. Then you’re damn right I’m a leftist and damn proud of it.
The big question is why anyone who participates in this board think they have enough income/assets to be effected by any “leftist” policies. You’re not that guy.
- planosteve
- Posts: 22973
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 8:04 pm
Re: Nate Silverman..
I was born a leftist. They tried to flip me in the 1st grade, but I didn't buy it. So, to this very day I still write with my left hand. Even though it's kind of messy when you use an ink pen.
There is no bad peace and there are no good wars
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 82 guests