
Wow! I just updated my electronic portfolio and...
- Bob Of Burleson
- Posts: 1803
- Joined: Mon May 26, 2014 10:59 am
Wow! I just updated my electronic portfolio and...
...its value increased tenfold. Y'think I might have made a typo?


Re: Wow! I just updated my electronic portfolio and...
Bob Of Burleson wrote:...its value increased tenfold. Y'think I might have made a typo?
Do you have fat fingers?
If you’re “woke”..you’re a loser.
- Bob Of Burleson
- Posts: 1803
- Joined: Mon May 26, 2014 10:59 am
Re: Wow! I just updated my electronic portfolio and...
GFB wrote:
Do you have fat fingers?
No, I have nothing similar to your head.
(See, I can throw insults, too.

Re: Wow! I just updated my electronic portfolio and...
Bob Of Burleson wrote:GFB wrote:
Do you have fat fingers?
No, I have nothing similar to your head.
(See, I can throw insults, too.)
Insult?
I guess you never heard the explanation we were given for what is now known as the "flash crash."
If you’re “woke”..you’re a loser.
Re: Wow! I just updated my electronic portfolio and...
The May 6, 2010 Flash Crash[1] also known as The Crash of 2:45, the 2010 Flash Crash, or simply the Flash Crash, was a United States stock market crash on Thursday May 6, 2010 in which the Dow Jones Industrial Average plunged about 1000 points (about 9%) only to recover those losses within minutes.[2] It was the second largest point swing, 1,010.14 points, and the biggest one-day point decline, 998.5 points, on an intraday basis in Dow Jones Industrial Average history.[3][4][5]
Early theories
1.The fat-finger theory: In the immediate aftermath of the plunge, several reports indicated that the event may have been triggered by a fat-finger trade, an inadvertent large "sell order" for Procter & Gamble stock, inciting massive algorithmic trading orders to dump the stock; however, this theory was quickly disproved after it was determined that Procter and Gamble's decline occurred after a significant decline in the E-mini S&P 500 Futures contracts.[23][24][25] The "fat-finger trade" hypothesis was also disproved when it was determined that existing CME Group and ICE safeguards would have prevented such an error.[26]
Early theories
1.The fat-finger theory: In the immediate aftermath of the plunge, several reports indicated that the event may have been triggered by a fat-finger trade, an inadvertent large "sell order" for Procter & Gamble stock, inciting massive algorithmic trading orders to dump the stock; however, this theory was quickly disproved after it was determined that Procter and Gamble's decline occurred after a significant decline in the E-mini S&P 500 Futures contracts.[23][24][25] The "fat-finger trade" hypothesis was also disproved when it was determined that existing CME Group and ICE safeguards would have prevented such an error.[26]
If you’re “woke”..you’re a loser.
- Bob Of Burleson
- Posts: 1803
- Joined: Mon May 26, 2014 10:59 am
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests