mccain to campaign with 'lindsey' in New Hampshire

[ralph]

--- http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powe ... ey-graham/ ---

[GFB]

Oh now that's just perfect!

[Cowman52]

Gets me in the frame of mind to go cheer them both on. Maybe both will decide they ain't as important as they would have us believe.

[Mark]

A pair of losers.

[ralph]

no use for either one of them BUT and I already said it on this board . 'graham' knows what he is talking about when it comes to foreign policy , and islam , 'Islamic state and war , 'imo' . No use at all for him on immigration and other issues though . ----------------------- As a comment , mccain , lindsey and another Arizonian named 'jeff flake' are all in the same gang of pro immigration / illegal immigration . --- http://www.breitbart.com/big-government ... e-amnesty/ ---

[planosteve]

Actually Graham's track record on foreign policy is terrible. He's almost always wrong.

At its core, however, Graham’s rhetoric is driven by an extraordinarily dystopian — and factually incorrect — view of the world. In January 2014, he said, “The world is literally about to blow up.” A year later, we’re still here and Graham is still wrong. “We live in the most dangerous times imaginable,” he said in July 2013. But it requires memory, not imagination, to realize that this is not true — unless Graham believes that World War II was the global equivalent of a traffic dispute. Considering that Graham, who was born in 1955 lived through the Cuban Missile Crisis, the Vietnam War, the Cold War, and 9/11, it’s a bit hard to square his regular alarmism about the state of the world with reality.

Indeed, Graham is so convinced that the world is about to proverbially tumble off its axis that this summer he said it “scares him” that Secretary of State John Kerry “thinks the world is in such good shape.” Even optimism causes Lindsey Graham to clutch pearls.

Remarkably, being consistently and habitually wrong about the nature of global affairs in the 21st century has not impeded Graham in being taken seriously as a foreign-policy voice. Like many Republicans, he enthusiastically supported the Iraq War, but even then he stood out with his trademark bombast and incorrectness. For example, in 2002 and 2003 he repeatedly declared that Saddam Hussein was “flat-out lying” about having weapons of mass destruction.

http://foreignpolicy.com/2015/01/27/lindsey-graham-wrong-on-everything/

[GFB]

On foreign policy, Planosteve is what you would call..a contrary indicator.

[planosteve]

On foreign policy, Planosteve is what you would call..a contrary indicator.

Never popular, but always right.

[ralph]

well , I think that he sounds good on the examples that I mentioned . islam , Islamic state in the middle east , caliphate . Still , Cruz , trump are my guys . I wouldn't vote for 'linsey' even if'n he got the nomination .

[GFB]

No need to worry there.

[Mark]

no use for either one of them BUT and I already said it on this board . 'graham' knows what he is talking about when it comes to foreign policy , and islam , 'Islamic state and war , 'imo' . No use at all for him on immigration and other issues though . ----------------------- As a comment , mccain , lindsey and another Arizonian named 'jeff flake' are all in the same gang of pro immigration / illegal immigration . --- http://www.breitbart.com/big-government ... e-amnesty/ ---

Disagree. Graham is a war monger. So is McCain.

[ralph]

well yeah , might be a war monger but as a general comment , sometimes war can be a good thing .

[GFB]

well yeah , might be a war monger but as a general comment , sometimes war can be a good thing .

Ralph nails it.

[ralph]

more 'mc cain' related news in the news . --- http://townhall.com/tipsheet/leahbarkou ... k-n2030440 --- looks like 'mc cain' stopped the arming of soldiers , military on USA property like the one that was attacked by a muslim in Chattanooga a week or so ago .