More hits for Hillary

Description of your first forum.
User avatar
Sangersteve
Posts: 8671
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 3:27 pm

More hits for Hillary

Postby Sangersteve » Sat Aug 15, 2015 7:09 am

I don't think she could have planed a debacle this well. Hats off to the lefties that continue to support Hillary

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton entrusted her email server to an IT firm that was not cleared to handle classified materials, according to the chief spokesman for the Defense Security Service.

The DSS is an arm of the Defense Department and is the only federal agency authorized to approve private sector company access to sensitive or confidential material.

The agency reviews and approves private contractors to assure they have secure facilities and approves security clearances for employees to clear them for access to sensitive or classified materials.

Since 2013, Clinton used Platte River Networks, a small Denver-based company, to upgrade and maintain her private email server at her home in Chappaqua, New York.




About 13,000 companies have received FCL or facility-wide clearance. But Platte River is not one of them.

“Platte River is not cleared” to have access to classified material, stated Cindy McGovern, chief public affairs officer for DSS in a telephone interview with The Daily Caller News Foundation.


It's a joke son,I say a joke

User avatar
Mark
Posts: 8851
Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 9:28 pm

Re: More hits for Hillary

Postby Mark » Sat Aug 15, 2015 7:35 am

Meanwhile, the Hildabeast is laughing the whole thing off as a big joke, a part of the "vast right-wing conspiracy."
November 5, 2024: The day America got Her second chance.

User avatar
planosteve
Posts: 23981
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 8:04 pm

Re: More hits for Hillary

Postby planosteve » Sat Aug 15, 2015 7:46 am

I wonder what the regulations say concerning classified information and Email. I was out of the military before Email came along.
Make America Great Again. Impeach Trump! :P

User avatar
Sangersteve
Posts: 8671
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 3:27 pm

Re: More hits for Hillary

Postby Sangersteve » Sat Aug 15, 2015 8:28 am

planosteve wrote:I wonder what the regulations say concerning classified information and Email. I was out of the military before Email came along.



Here are some.

http://www.archives.gov/records-mgmt/bu ... 13-03.html
It's a joke son,I say a joke

User avatar
planosteve
Posts: 23981
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 8:04 pm

Re: More hits for Hillary

Postby planosteve » Sat Aug 15, 2015 8:34 am

I don't know the regulations concerning Email, but I'm pretty sure you cannot email information identified as classified. If that's right it would not be necessary for the company to be cleared. The main issue seems to be whether information on some Emails Hillary received should have been identified as classified, but wasn't.
If someone sends you an email that contains classified information, but it is not identified as such how are you to know it's classified information? If you have it on your computer are you guilty of anything?
I doubt it.
Make America Great Again. Impeach Trump! :P

User avatar
planosteve
Posts: 23981
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 8:04 pm

Re: More hits for Hillary

Postby planosteve » Sat Aug 15, 2015 8:48 am

Sangersteve wrote:
planosteve wrote:I wonder what the regulations say concerning classified information and Email. I was out of the military before Email came along.



Here are some.

http://www.archives.gov/records-mgmt/bu ... 13-03.html

This is about records management. It doesn't address classified information. I think what we're seeing is just the usual overreaching by the Hillary haters.
Make America Great Again. Impeach Trump! :P

BillB
Posts: 2302
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 7:47 pm

Re: More hits for Hillary

Postby BillB » Sat Aug 15, 2015 8:54 am

Hillary is toast.
Her habitual lying will bring her down. Wait and see.

User avatar
GFB
Posts: 31672
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 6:59 pm
Location: Native American

Re: More hits for Hillary

Postby GFB » Sat Aug 15, 2015 8:58 am

BillB wrote:Hillary is toast.
Her habitual lying will bring her down. Wait and see.

The typical Democrat is paying attention and/ or cares?

I don't see it.
If you’re “woke”..you’re a loser.

BillB
Posts: 2302
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 7:47 pm

Re: More hits for Hillary

Postby BillB » Sat Aug 15, 2015 9:03 am

GFB wrote:
BillB wrote:Hillary is toast.
Her habitual lying will bring her down. Wait and see.

The typical Democrat is paying attention and/ or cares?

I don't see it.


I know you don't agree with me about this.
Let's wait and see.

User avatar
planosteve
Posts: 23981
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 8:04 pm

Re: More hits for Hillary

Postby planosteve » Sat Aug 15, 2015 9:32 am

What I find is that Democrats are not all that fond of Hillary. They just find Republicans worse.
Make America Great Again. Impeach Trump! :P

BillB
Posts: 2302
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 7:47 pm

Re: More hits for Hillary

Postby BillB » Sat Aug 15, 2015 9:36 am

planosteve wrote:What I find is that Democrats are not all that fond of Hillary. They just find Republicans worse.


Democrats are getting less fond of her.
58% say she is lying.

User avatar
planosteve
Posts: 23981
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 8:04 pm

Re: More hits for Hillary

Postby planosteve » Sat Aug 15, 2015 9:44 am

BillB wrote:
planosteve wrote:What I find is that Democrats are not all that fond of Hillary. They just find Republicans worse.


Democrats are getting less fond of her.
58% say she is lying.

Yeah, and I heard Donnie Deutch on Mourning Joe yesterday say that he was tired of Hillary! Everyone was shocked.
Make America Great Again. Impeach Trump! :P

BillB
Posts: 2302
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 7:47 pm

Re: More hits for Hillary

Postby BillB » Sat Aug 15, 2015 10:20 am

planosteve wrote:
BillB wrote:
planosteve wrote:What I find is that Democrats are not all that fond of Hillary. They just find Republicans worse.


Democrats are getting less fond of her.
58% say she is lying.

Yeah, and I heard Donnie Deutch on Mourning Joe yesterday say that he was tired of Hillary! Everyone was shocked.


I'll try to find it, but I read an article a couple of days ago that said the major Democrat donors are pressing Obama to shut Hillary down and get her out.
Their donations are starting to dry up because of her. The money we're talking about is used for congressional elections as well as presidential.

I think she'll be threatened with an indictment unless she folds up shop.

jellowrestling
Posts: 8576
Joined: Mon May 26, 2014 1:16 am

Re: More hits for Hillary

Postby jellowrestling » Sat Aug 15, 2015 9:22 pm

Hillary is doing so well that now Biden and Gore are talking about getting into the race.

User avatar
GRANDPA
Posts: 3043
Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 10:54 pm

Re: More hits for Hillary

Postby GRANDPA » Sat Aug 15, 2015 11:35 pm

My lefty loony friends are strangely silent about Hillary. They all support Bernie now.
A bad peace inevitably leads to a worse war.

User avatar
Mark
Posts: 8851
Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 9:28 pm

Re: More hits for Hillary

Postby Mark » Sun Aug 16, 2015 8:09 am

Nominating Bernie would be the first honest thing the Democrat party has done in decades.

Communism = Socialism = Marxism = Democrats
November 5, 2024: The day America got Her second chance.

User avatar
planosteve
Posts: 23981
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 8:04 pm

Re: More hits for Hillary

Postby planosteve » Sun Aug 16, 2015 8:35 am

So far what I see is the people that seem outraged are the hardcore Clinton haters. Partiularly, Judicialwatch.org which was on Washington Journal this morning. They seemed oblivious when it was pointed out that Powell used private Email when he was SofS too. Also, they don't seem to be able to decide exactly what she did wrong. If having a private "outlaw" server was wrong why wasn't the issue raised by any of the numerous people that were aware of it? Or if she violated a rule while using it, what rule was it? Then there is the wiping the server issue. Did she just delete them or intentionally overwrite them? That is still being investigated. It's not clear if that is even any kind of a violation.
Make America Great Again. Impeach Trump! :P

jellowrestling
Posts: 8576
Joined: Mon May 26, 2014 1:16 am

Re: More hits for Hillary

Postby jellowrestling » Sun Aug 16, 2015 10:25 am

planosteve wrote:So far what I see is the people that seem outraged are the hardcore Clinton haters. Partiularly, Judicialwatch.org which was on Washington Journal this morning. They seemed oblivious when it was pointed out that Powell used private Email when he was SofS too. Also, they don't seem to be able to decide exactly what she did wrong. If having a private "outlaw" server was wrong why wasn't the issue raised by any of the numerous people that were aware of it? Or if she violated a rule while using it, what rule was it? Then there is the wiping the server issue. Did she just delete them or intentionally overwrite them? That is still being investigated. It's not clear if that is even any kind of a violation.

If you run a red light, does it matter whether or not you intended to do it? You have an obligation to stop, and you know you have that obligation.
When Powell was SOS, email was still new.

User avatar
BigTex
Posts: 6477
Joined: Mon May 26, 2014 5:23 pm

Re: More hits for Hillary

Postby BigTex » Sun Aug 16, 2015 11:04 am

How long after she was sworn in as Sec of State did she receive a briefing on security of government documents?

User avatar
GFB
Posts: 31672
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 6:59 pm
Location: Native American

Re: More hits for Hillary

Postby GFB » Sun Aug 16, 2015 11:19 am

planosteve wrote:So far what I see is the people that seem outraged are the hardcore Clinton haters. Partiularly, Judicialwatch.org which was on Washington Journal this morning. They seemed oblivious when it was pointed out that Powell used private Email when he was SofS too. Also, they don't seem to be able to decide exactly what she did wrong. If having a private "outlaw" server was wrong why wasn't the issue raised by any of the numerous people that were aware of it? Or if she violated a rule while using it, what rule was it? Then there is the wiping the server issue. Did she just delete them or intentionally overwrite them? That is still being investigated. It's not clear if that is even any kind of a violation.


Classified e-mails now at 60

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/201 ... -for-clas/
If you’re “woke”..you’re a loser.


Return to “Your first forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 50 guests