The result of court ruling: Silverstein makes a huge profit off of the 9/11 attacks.

http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICL ... stein.html
planosteve wrote:A federal jury on Monday ruled that the assault on the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center was in fact two occurrences for insurance purposes. The finding in U.S. District Court in Manhattan means leaseholder Larry Silverstein may collect up to $4.6 billion, according to reports. [Forbes.com 12/06/04]
The result of court ruling: Silverstein makes a huge profit off of the 9/11 attacks.![]()
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICL ... stein.html
Dancer wrote:planosteve wrote:A federal jury on Monday ruled that the assault on the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center was in fact two occurrences for insurance purposes. The finding in U.S. District Court in Manhattan means leaseholder Larry Silverstein may collect up to $4.6 billion, according to reports. [Forbes.com 12/06/04]
The result of court ruling: Silverstein makes a huge profit off of the 9/11 attacks.![]()
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICL ... stein.html
http:/ what reallyhappened.com and whatever else follows is nothing but BS and one day you will figure it out. Or not. My guess is the second option.
Perhaps the judge didn't understand ad hominem logical fallacies.BigTex wrote:I had a friend in high school debate who concocted a phony attribution. He won the debate, and was completely wrong.
BigTex wrote:Just shows that you can win the debate with incorrect information.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests