jellowrestling wrote:rusty wrote:jellowrestling wrote:You'll have to ask Democrat hero Gerry Studds about that (well, if he weren't dead, anyway).
And what does Gerry Studds, who's been dead ten years, have to do with the current race in Alabama?
Man, you're pulling the red herrings out of your butt like crazy today. LOL! Next thing you know you'll come up with something about Caligula or Liberace
Studds was a liberal hero for years. The fact that he was sodomizing a 17-yr-old congressional page was no impediment to his political career (because he was a Democrat). Instead, he was a liberal "hero". And that was in 1983, a few years after the alleged conduct of Roy Moore. Studds continued to be re-elected until he retired in 1997. So, apparently, banging a child is OK if you are a gay Democrat, but not if you are Republican (although Moore was a Democrat at the time). I think it's interesting that the media hasn't brought up this inconvenient fact.
Any and all types of infidelity, sexual harassment, and sexual deviancy have always been resume enhancements for liberals.