Mark wrote:When is the Cackler going to start talking about issues? When is she going to take questions from reporters?
When is Trump going to talk about issues? All he does is crap on people and says how great he is, or that he is a victim.
Mark wrote:When is the Cackler going to start talking about issues? When is she going to take questions from reporters?
GFB wrote:Wisconsin Harris +1.0
Pennsylvania Tie
Michigan Harris +2.1
Arizona Harris +0.2
Nevada Trump +1.3
North Carolina 47.6 46.4 Trump +1.2
Georgia Trump +1
RCP Electoral Map Trump 219 Harris 208
No Toss Up States Trump 276 Harris 262
planosteve wrote:GFB wrote:Wisconsin Harris +1.0
Pennsylvania Tie
Michigan Harris +2.1
Arizona Harris +0.2
Nevada Trump +1.3
North Carolina 47.6 46.4 Trump +1.2
Georgia Trump +1
RCP Electoral Map Trump 219 Harris 208
No Toss Up States Trump 276 Harris 262
Wouldn't you think that someone who had been there before, been tested, was a known quantity, etc. would rank a whole lot higher than someone who wasn't?
Mark wrote:planosteve wrote:GFB wrote:Wisconsin Harris +1.0
Pennsylvania Tie
Michigan Harris +2.1
Arizona Harris +0.2
Nevada Trump +1.3
North Carolina 47.6 46.4 Trump +1.2
Georgia Trump +1
RCP Electoral Map Trump 219 Harris 208
No Toss Up States Trump 276 Harris 262
Wouldn't you think that someone who had been there before, been tested, was a known quantity, etc. would rank a whole lot higher than someone who wasn't?
By your logic, Jimmy Carter should have beaten Ronald Reagan in a landslide.
Red Oak wrote:Carter was definitely not the best for me.
I suffered the Stagflation, fuel shortages, and malaise as someone just starting out.
Mark wrote:planosteve wrote:GFB wrote:Wisconsin Harris +1.0
Pennsylvania Tie
Michigan Harris +2.1
Arizona Harris +0.2
Nevada Trump +1.3
North Carolina 47.6 46.4 Trump +1.2
Georgia Trump +1
RCP Electoral Map Trump 219 Harris 208
No Toss Up States Trump 276 Harris 262
Wouldn't you think that someone who had been there before, been tested, was a known quantity, etc. would rank a whole lot higher than someone who wasn't?
By your logic, Jimmy Carter should have beaten Ronald Reagan in a landslide.
GFB wrote:Wisconsin Harris +1.0
Pennsylvania Trump +0.1
Michigan Harris +2.0
Arizona Trump +0.2
Nevada Trump +1.3
North Carolina Trump +1.2
Georgia Trump +1.0
Electoral map Trump 219 Harris 208
No toss ups Trump 287 Harris 251
planosteve wrote:Mark wrote:planosteve wrote:Wouldn't you think that someone who had been there before, been tested, was a known quantity, etc. would rank a whole lot higher than someone who wasn't?
By your logic, Jimmy Carter should have beaten Ronald Reagan in a landslide.
Reagan had charisma. Movie actor. Military service during WWII. Gov. of California, twice. Handsome guy. Carter from Plains Georgia didn't have any of that.
Mark wrote:planosteve wrote:Mark wrote:
By your logic, Jimmy Carter should have beaten Ronald Reagan in a landslide.
Reagan had charisma. Movie actor. Military service during WWII. Gov. of California, twice. Handsome guy. Carter from Plains Georgia didn't have any of that.[/quot
You think the Cackler has more charisma than President Trump? Why was she out before Iowa the only time she actually ran a primary campaign?
planosteve wrote:GFB wrote:Wisconsin Harris +1.0
Pennsylvania Trump +0.1
Michigan Harris +2.0
Arizona Trump +0.2
Nevada Trump +1.3
North Carolina Trump +1.2
Georgia Trump +1.0
Electoral map Trump 219 Harris 208
No toss ups Trump 287 Harris 251
You know what would be nice? If you would actually post a link to the information that you are talking about. What "electoral map"?
GFB wrote:planosteve wrote:GFB wrote:Wisconsin Harris +1.0
Pennsylvania Trump +0.1
Michigan Harris +2.0
Arizona Trump +0.2
Nevada Trump +1.3
North Carolina Trump +1.2
Georgia Trump +1.0
Electoral map Trump 219 Harris 208
No toss ups Trump 287 Harris 251
You know what would be nice? If you would actually post a link to the information that you are talking about. What "electoral map"?
As I said..go to realclearpolitics.com
It’ll take you right to the page that shows the chart this information comes from.
planosteve wrote:GFB wrote:planosteve wrote:
You know what would be nice? If you would actually post a link to the information that you are talking about. What "electoral map"?
As I said..go to realclearpolitics.com
It’ll take you right to the page that shows the chart this information comes from.
No it doesn't. You have to know which page it is! Just give me the link!
planosteve wrote:Ok, now I see why you like it. It's biased information!
RCP receives its most traffic during election seasons and is known for its aggregation of polling data.[7][8][9] In 2008, the site's founders said their goal was to give readers "ideological diversity", although in recent years it has become more associated with conservatism and the political right.[10][11]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RealClearPolitics
I have no problem if you want to diss "Commie Carmela".
Yeah right and "more associated with conservatism and the political right"GFB wrote:planosteve wrote:Ok, now I see why you like it. It's biased information!
RCP receives its most traffic during election seasons and is known for its aggregation of polling data.[7][8][9] In 2008, the site's founders said their goal was to give readers "ideological diversity", although in recent years it has become more associated with conservatism and the political right.[10][11]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RealClearPolitics
I have no problem if you want to diss "Commie Carmela".
They’re not a polling company.
They’re simply an average of all the major polls.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 202 guests