ralph wrote:the only discrimination that I would oppose is legal gov practiced Discrimination against anyone . What is happening at MELISSAS is simply the government over stepping their bounds , mayhem or cd !!
I'll tell you what. You can call me whatever you wish. I personally prefer Castle Doctrine as that is my chosen handle and I have used it for a very long time. It has a specific meaning and significance to me.
Now, about your position on discrimination, as I understand it you are in favor of discrimination without reservation. Is that correct? I'm not sure what you mean by "legal gov practiced Discrimination". Are you referring to anti-discrimination laws that create protected classes or bar discrimination that has commonly been practiced against certain classes?
Is your generally position that discrimination on a personal or individual level are none of the government's business? Is your objection then to the rule's very existence (as illegitimate) rather than the application in this specific case?
Generally, I agree that government should stay the Hell out of our private lives. And, honestly, it does a passing fair job of that. However, as a society, we have demonstrated that we don't play well together without some rules and regulation. In particular, we don't treat each other very well when there are significant differences obvious. So, we have only ourselves (or some of ourselves) to blame for the current situation. If we didn't discriminate so openly on a public or institutional basis we wouldn't need these laws. Unfortunately, we do, so we brought them on ourselves.